I don’t think the majority of anti vaxxers are in the demographic that covid typically effects to be honest.
Really? Going by the FB laugh emoji crowd and the videos of the idiots at rallies and 'serving papers' that I've seen on here, they all look like middle-aged alcoholics.
Fair enough. I stay off facebook for that reason tbf
And that’s a perfectly sensible view. As is, at least in my opinion, deciding not to if you’ve had the disease previously and were unaffected.
Because it might stop them infected a relative who isn't fit and healthy.
That's how evolution works, ask Darwin.
Have you ever had shingles? you know the 2nd infection of the virus that causes chickenpox?
Clearly over? 17,000 in hospital!
Yes the worst is overBecause it might stop them infected a relative who isn't fit and healthy.
Also, by 2027 the virus is expected to have mutated to something significantly weaker. We only need to do this whilst people are getting hospitalised in vast numbers (like now)
That's how evolution works, ask Darwin.
Have you ever had shingles? you know the 2nd infection of the virus that causes chickenpox?
Clearly over? 17,000 in hospital!
Why is it depressing ?Some depressing comments from the Moderna CEO
'Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel on Thursday said the efficacy of boosters against Covid-19 will likely decline over time, and people may need a fourth shot in the fall to increase their protection.'
'Bancel said the efficacy of boosters will probably decline over the course of several months, similar to what happened with the first two doses'
'I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great'
'The Moderna CEO said governments, including the U.K. and South Korea, are already ordering the doses in preparation. “I still believe we’re going to need boosters in the fall of ’22 and forward'
'However, the efficacy of booster shots starts to decline after about four weeks, according to the study. Boosters were 55% to 70% effective at preventing infection at weeks five to nine, and 40% to 50% effective 10 weeks after receiving the shot'
Much better than immunity waning so much that lockdown is returned though.
Me neither, people taking time off work after receiving a vaccine must be miniscule
But the not so fit and healthy relative will be double jabbed & with booster?Because it might stop them infected a relative who isn't fit and healthy.
Also, by 2027 the virus is expected to have mutated to something significantly weaker. We only need to do this whilst people are getting hospitalised in vast numbers (like now)
That's how evolution works, ask Darwin.
Have you ever had shingles? you know the 2nd infection of the virus that causes chickenpox?
Clearly over? 17,000 in hospital!
Apart from its not an annual jab?
It's the same principle.
It's not a binary thing. It simply reduces the chances of infection and transmission.
One is annually the others is 4 a year atm quite different, especially for those who don't react well to them
ThisWell i mean its not going to benefit them if one vaccine lasts forever is it
you could say that with regards most medical treatments to be fair, more money to manage an ill person and keep them alive than to prevent or cure.Well i mean its not going to benefit them if one vaccine lasts forever is it
One virus has been around at various times throughout the year, is new and evolving with increasing rates of immunity from prior infection and vaccination over the last two years.
Seen as you're so well informed why don't you apply for a grant to fund a long lasting coronavirus vaccine. I'm sure every country in the world will buy it from you?Well i mean its not going to benefit them if one vaccine lasts forever is it
