D
Dilligaf60
Guest
I dont think that man has smiled since he had wind as a baby.Good luck with that mate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont think that man has smiled since he had wind as a baby.Good luck with that mate
I dont think that man has smiled since he had wind as a baby.
He’ll pick Leadbitter for Dobson and Wyke for Grigg. We’ll be utterly pedestrian
It's not entirely wrong, if you don't trust your wing backs to backtrack 100% or are playing a quick counter attacking team. The 3 CBs give you wider cover if there is a quick transition against you, if your wing backs are very attacking which is often the point in the 5 midfield, having a holding midfielder as one of the centre 3 midfielders does make some sense so you aren't caught out.For me the most ridiculous thing is playing a holding midfielder in a 3-5-2. The whole point of 3 at the back is that it gives you an extra man to cover, why do you then need yet another covering player? Most teams would play with a more advanced midfielder rather than have one drop deeper.
The next thing is chris maguire as a centre midfielder. He's gone missing in both games he's played that role which I thought was odd given I assumed he was meant to be playing as a 10 in a 3-4-1-2 and thought that would suit him to he ground. Makes sense why he's been so anonymous, if he's being asked to defend as part of a midfield three. Doesnt know what he's doing.
PP saying today grant Leadbutter training well and played in deep role all career. When mention scowen he said he saw him as replacement for maguire!!! Wtf
For me the most ridiculous thing is playing a holding midfielder in a 3-5-2. The whole point of 3 at the back is that it gives you an extra man to cover, why do you then need yet another covering player? Most teams would play with a more advanced midfielder rather than have one drop deeper.
Correct. Our only attacking routes are an overlap with Hume on the left or a similar tactic with Onien down the right. Stifle that and we resort to hoofball which Grigg as a lone striker will not thrive on. Simply put we need more down the middleFormation is a joke imo. It's complicated and hard to make work but easy to defend against. Over reliance on width creating the space to get at sides. Stop the width and we're pretty much redundant in a creative sense.
Fuck it!
........................... Burge.............................
...... Willis............ Wright........ Xhemajli..........
O'Nien........Scowen..............Power.......... Hume
........................... Neil
...................Graham.....Grigg
PP said he needs a couple of u23 games before being risked! I'd bet that because of schedules that means he's out of side for 3-4 weeksI wonder where Embleton is he told us weeks ago he had a minor injury not been seen since
Better line up that but power for dobson for me, even when dobson is available again .If he continues with 3-4-1-2 which he will unfortunately, I hope he goes with
........................... Burge.............................
...... Willis............ Wright........ Xhamalji....
Gooch.......... Scowen... Dobson...... Hume
................................maguire......................
................... Graham...........O'Brien............
I think personally that gooch will give us more going forward than o'nien and Grigg just isn't doing it so Graham might be able to hold it up better and create space for others. This would be my team
I dont think that man has smiled since he had wind as a baby.