Sunderland Council

  • Thread starter My awkward Piles
  • Start date

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just seen on the news these elected clowns spunked 25k on trips to USA, apparently to get investment!

I really hope Labour get the boot
 
Just seen on the news these elected clowns spunked 25k on trips to USA, apparently to get investment!

I really hope Labour get the boot

Is that so outrageous?

Isn't what everyone is constantly whinging about lack of investment?

Take Cameron's word for it if you think he's trustworthy though :lol:
 
Is that so outrageous?

Isn't what everyone is constantly whinging about lack of investment?

Take Cameron's word for it if you think he's trustworthy though :lol:

Certainly no less trustworthy than any of the others.

They dont have to spunk all that dosh, theres other ways and means, video conferencing etc instead of having jollys to the states
 
Certainly no less trustworthy than any of the others.

They dont have to spunk all that dosh, theres other ways and means, video conferencing etc instead of having jollys to the states

What so you think just ringing up someone in America and saying "EYYYA PLEEZ INVEST IN SUNDALAND WA GEET CANNY LADS OWWA EYYA LIKE." Is going to go down well?

We're hardly an attractive area. Going over, making the case, meeting people, making connections and all the rest is going to make a huge difference.

Decide what you want.
 
wonder what Cameron would say if the Council bought Phillip Green in to advise on efficiencies, oh wait a minute
 
had a canny bite off her this morning:



i see the grammar is getting worse, must be an MP

Erm, the MP's have taken a cut.

Here's a simple question to ask you friend, how many Labour M.P's were cash and real estate millionaires when they entered office, i would say less than 10%.
Then ask her how many Labour M.P's were cash and real estate millionaires when they left office,answer, just about all of them.

2 faced *****, you might also want to inform her that due to paybacks,the value of the shares and fees levied on the banks we are actually in credit now for bailing them out, as i know it's only a matter of time before that chestnut arises (It still amounted to less than 10% of the debt), you might want to ask her what fiscal deficit is and why we were borrowing for 10 years before the banking crisis, as that's where the debt is from.

That should be enough to send her on a mentalist rant as it's all facts and not opinion.
 
you might also want to inform her that due to paybacks,the value of the shares and fees levied on the banks we are actually in credit now for bailing them out, as i know it's only a matter of time before that chestnut arises (It still amounted to less than 10% of the debt), you might want to ask her what fiscal deficit is and why we were borrowing for 10 years before the banking crisis, as that's where the debt is from.

That should be enough to send her on a mentalist rant as it's all facts and not opinion.

I think youve been getting your numbers from the express again
 
You certainly have been , now fuck off and do your attention seeking elsewhere fucknut.

I've been caught out by 4 'smilies'? You know all too well your figures include capatlised pension debt and various other contingent liabilities. But because you cant debate the point you post some emocicons. Well done Einstein.
 

Lets have your sums then.

Remember youve set yourself up here as needing to arrive at less than 10% of national debt being the cost of the bank bail out but without including capatalised pensions and contingent liabilities.

Come on then.
 
Lets have your sums then.

Remember youve set yourself up here as needing to arrive at less than 10% of national debt being the cost of the bank bail out but without including capatalised pensions and contingent liabilities.

Come on then.

Come on what, read it again and try again.
I said we are now in credit, are you saying we aren't (and the total bail out cost was £850 billion BTW,need me to break it down for you?)
 
Come on what, read it again and try again.
I said we are now in credit, are you saying we aren't (and the total bail out cost was £850 billion BTW,need me to break it down for you?)

What are you playing dumb for?

You said quite clearly the bail out was 'less than 10%' of the deficit.

Anyone who can read can see this.
 
What are you playing dumb for?

You said quite clearly the bail out was 'less than 10%' of the deficit.

Anyone who can read can see this.

It was, don't you realise how much debt we are in?

Nice of you to miss out the fact it's been covered so how can a debt that's covered still be a debt?
 
It was, don't you realise how much debt we are in?

Nice of you to miss out the fact it's been covered so how can a debt that's covered still be a debt?

I was restating your original post you idiot. You referred to it as a debt yourself. Do you really need me to post your direct quote to get you to acknowledge this?

It was, don't you realise how much debt we are in?

So according to your figures the debt is more than 8.5 trillion?

AND YOU DIDNT GET THEM FROM SOMETHING LIKE THE express?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was restating your original post you idiot. You referred to it as a debt yourself. Do you really need me to post your direct quote to get you to acknowledge this?

OK then, the bailout was less than 10% and it doesn't matter as it's paid back.
The whole £1.34 trillion (or £2.25 trillion incl.liabilities) we owe is completely down to Labour.

Happy now, glad i cleared that up.

I was restating your original post you idiot. You referred to it as a debt yourself. Do you really need me to post your direct quote to get you to acknowledge this?



So according to your figures the debt is more than 8.5 trillion?

AND YOU DIDNT GET THEM FROM SOMETHING LIKE THE express?

You really don't have a clue do you?:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
OK then, the bailout was less than 10% and it doesn't matter as it's paid back.
The whole £1.34 trillion (or £2.25 trillion incl.liabilities) we owe is completely down to Labour.

Happy now, glad i cleared that up.

Maths isnt your strong point. Thick as shit, wont acknowledge hes been rumbled and ignorantly restates his point. Anyone who can add up can see youve spouted shit and failed under the slightest of scrutiny. I wont post any smilies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top