I suppose that just comes down to our own perceptions chunky, what I'm saying though, is I don't believe people are blaming them for the incident - just the mishandling of the suspension - and of course we know that the only man responsible for his not being in Australia is Ben Stokes himself.
Again I reiterate, I thought the suspension was bang on at first. It was an excellent PR move amongst other things. However I do believe that there would be very very little dissent from the public if they reinstated him for Perth.
It's clear there's a real clamour now to get him back involved. It's still possible that they suspend him again during any trial process, but I do feel that they could come out and say that he's served his punishment for the misdemeanours of being out late, pissed and fighting. Then add on, that should the Police and CPS look to prosecute, further sanctions will be placed and potentially another punishment given, if the need dictates, upon completion of that process.
In so doing, that would send a clear message that firstly, contracted England cricketers have to uphold a good level of behaviour even when not officially on duty. Then secondly, it would still stress that they want to allow the lawmakers to do their work without pressure or prejudice from FTECB.
If anyone's got Strauss on Facebook or LinkedIn, forward him my idea