SSN reporting Bridge medical.....


Status
Not open for further replies.
He's plays in a position where we have no real cover unless you count Bardsley.

It's a loan move so it's no big risk and if he plays, and plays well, we can sign him.

I vote 'yes' :-D

Whats this? common sense and a balanced well thought through opinion?

Ban this non hypocrite, exile him to France or somewhere.
 
Never had left back for years, we sign one and pricks are whinging, give the lad a chance ffs
 
Understand why we have done it but I never understood why he went for so much money twice. Very one footed OK as a loan wouldn't want him permanently given his age and what he will be on at City and I don't think he is that good.

Given he has played 1 game this season he won't be fully match fit and rusty so it will take a few weeks.

Like most fans not seen that much of him, nobody has really because he has only played half a season for the past decade on average. But like most LB's / defenders you tend to notice them when they play badly and he has done that the times I have seen him.
 
He's f***ing shite. No one seen him the past two years?

Three England managers got it badly wrong too then (36 caps). For what it's worth my opinion is that his form has suffered badly with the Terry incident and the subsequent press coverage it had. Perhaps he's a bit of a sensitive soul and just needed a bit of support from those around him and never got it......my money is on MON getting him back to somewhere near his best form over the next few months.
 
Understand why we have done it but I never understood why he went for so much money twice. Very one footed OK as a loan wouldn't want him permanently given his age and what he will be on at City and I don't think he is that good.

Given he has played 1 game this season he won't be fully match fit and rusty so it will take a few weeks.

Like most fans not seen that much of him, nobody has really because he has only played half a season for the past decade on average. But like most LB's / defenders you tend to notice them when they play badly and he has done that the times I have seen him.

........back to you in the studio
 
Good player if O'Neill can get him back to his best, and provides extra options for us.
 
winnie said:
You may well be right, but it would be nice if some of the others give the lad a chance.

People like Bridge and Davies have been around for years.

It's perfectly reasonable for people to already have an opinion on them and state that opinion on here.

It's nothing to do with 'giving anyone a chance'.

I don't see how people stating and discussing their opinion of a player on here influences them having a 'chance'.

Saying you don't rate someone on here isn't going to the match and booing them.

Are people supposed to change their views on players once they are linked with a move to us?

If he signed for Newcastle no doubt he'd be shite again!
 
Last edited:
Never had left back for years, we sign one and pricks are whinging, give the lad a chance ffs

He will get a chance,as will Davies,but you can only go on what you know and what you've seen,KD is less of a risk but Bridge ffs,if Bruce or the Mags had signed him what would reactions have been?O'Neill has been nothing but superb since arriving but he will officially be the messiah if he can do owt with him!
 
just out of interest, who do people think we should be signing as near enough every name we are linked with is "shite"? some right doom merchants here
 
Good player, a better left back than we have. Good move, Ricardson was our worst player on Sunday imho

At last,the voice of reason.Richardson will never be a left back as long as he has a hole in his arse....it's a position we've needed to address for ages.As Riv says,if it's a loan move,it can be more or less risk free.
 
Could it be that he has been brought in to replace Richardson. I doubt it myself but plenty of rumours earlier in the month.
 
is this some sort of sick, twisted joke?
qpr sign taiwo and we sign bridge? knew hughes would have been the better option
 
just out of interest, who do people think we should be signing as near enough every name we are linked with is "shite"? some right doom merchants here

I agree, utterly pathetic. Bed wetting knackers twisting over potential signings. I'll reserve judgement until I've seen the lads play 6+ games for us.

is this some sort of sick, twisted joke?
qpr sign taiwo and we sign bridge? knew hughes would have been the better option

Fuck off ya scouse Bukyak
 
A cheap deal to improve arguably our weakest position. When in form he was quality, who's to say a change of club isnt just what he needs. Would people be happier if we spent millions on a foreigner who was decent on FIFA 11, only for him to fail?
 
Wank pots on here moaning and groaning again.

If MoN fancies him to do a job then so be it -have faith
 
Don't know what to make of this one. I really don't mind Richardson at left back. Bridge I have always just thought of him as an ordinary full back, not much pace, which with our current back four makes Bardsley our quickest defender. But for the first time I can remember we will have two natural full backs in their correct position.
 
Flan said:
A cheap deal to improve arguably our weakest position. When in form he was quality, who's to say a change of club isnt just what he needs. Would people be happier if we spent millions on a foreigner who was decent on FIFA 11, only for him to fail?

Even if he is wiling to take a 50% pay cut I don't see how it can be cheap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top