Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No doubt SL are a shadow of what they were but they did stuff the Aussies last year. May yet still win it of course but good to see Zimbabwe competing in Test cricket. Can only be good for the game (even though we won't play them)
I've as much idea as you mate. Obviously know the bare bones of it but not much detail beyond that. It hasn't really come up since the 2003 World Cup as far as I can recall. I've read a few players' autobiographies which touch on it but not in great detail as they were pretty much in the dark and just went on the advice of the authorities.I won a decent bit of money on SL in that series .
As for the Zimbabwe situation, I sort of know, but is there any literature out there on the political issues with why they were in the wilderness? And subsequently why we won't play them?
Back to this game, 252-6, lead of 262, pitch seems to be very placid when the shine is off the ball - but if Zimbabwe get another 50, you'd have to put them as favourites.
Sri Lanka need 388 to win.
Started well, 56/0
Was just going to post the same thing. Proper Test cricket, something certain members of the England set up seem to have forgotten about (if they even knew about it in the first place)Indeed. Closed on 170-3, with 217 needed. Just edging infront in the betting, slight favourites, sets up a fantastic final day. Almost been the perfect Test - which is more than can be said for that shite at Trent Bridge.
Was just going to post the same thing. Proper Test cricket, something certain members of the England set up seem to have forgotten about (if they even knew about it in the first place)
Sri Lanka are heading towards West Indies levels of poor, already lost the one day series and probably going to win this very unconvincingly.