CARLOS CLASS
Striker
9 times out of 10 the ref protects the keeper and gives the free kick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would say the odds are even higher than that.9 times out of 10 the ref protects the keeper and gives the free kick
Pants was watching the ball though, Berahinho being small pushed into him around his midriff meaning he was easily overbalanced. Foul imhoHe definitely jumped into Pants but hell Pants is a bloody giant and he should have made mincemeat of Barahino
Having watched it multiple times I can see why people are saying it's a foul but I still think it was extremely poor and weak goalkeeping.
Why? They simply aren't given thesedays. I don't expect special treatment for my team.We be going beserk if we had one disallowed for the same .
I think you have us mixed up with them. Even the edited highlights didn't show a single shot on target by WBA. I reckon Berahino couldn't believe his luck when 3 fouls were committed and the ref didn't blow. 99% of refs would have given that. Jesus that clown has been quick enough to give them for and against in the past. It was hand ball, barging when the goalie was off the ground and dangerous play kicking the ball when he had both hands on the ball.It shows how shite we are when this is such a talking point. At the end of the day Pants conceded 1 goal in 90 mins. That's decent.
The reason it's a talking point is because we never managed or looked like scoring a goal ourselves. The least little mistake becomes such a big deal because his team mates aren't good enough to get him out the shit.
People also need to look at Larsson and Yedlin and see how they made a pigs ear of stopping the cross coming in in the 1st place
Course it mattersDoesn't matter. We got beat. Move on...
100% guaranteed foul if it had been us attacking
At normal speed I didn't. After seeing replays he did. Unfortunately the ref only gets 1 look.
Exactly I think it was a foul,however understandable why not given
I know. It doesn't matter on who it is, or it shouldn't. 3 infringements in a few seconds. The main one, jumping into pants, was clear as day. Voice of reason, do you admit its unusual for a goal of this nature to be given in 2015? Normally referees protect goalkeepers very well, too well if anything. Even the suggestion of any contact and the whistle normally goes.f***ing hell man,what is the difference between us and West Brom like
In 2015 when it comes to goalkeepers yes it is pretty much non contact whether we like it or not.Is football now a non contact sport? They collided in the air, the keeper for me should have been stronger, the jump wasn't into him directly which is what the ref probably saw
I know. It doesn't matter on who it is, or it shouldn't. 3 infringements in a few seconds. The main one, jumping into pants, was clear as day. Voice of reason, do you admit its unusual for a goal of this nature to be given in 2015? Normally referees protect goalkeepers very well, too well if anything. Even the suggestion of any contact and the whistle normally goes.