Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone know why Johny O Mara and Luke Bambridge are playing doubles with different partners this week and are actually playing against one another right now despite winning the last 2 tournaments as a pairing?
FFS I was just coming on this thread to ask you how I can find out which games Delpo is going to play in. I can only go to the tour on the Wednesady or Thursday night but Id only be interested in Delpo or Federer or NadalA lot has happened since this last post. Svitolina won the WTA finals in Singapore on Sunday, beating Stephens 3-6 6-2 6-2 to take her biggest title to date. The next batch of women (ranked 9-20, minus withdrawals) are currently competing in Zhuhai for the WTA Elite Trophy. Defending champion Goerges is through to the semi finals and will be joined by one of Wang/Keys, one of Muguruza/Sevastova and one of Sabalenka/Garcia/Barty, all of which will be decided tomorrow.
They've reached the QF stage of the Paris Masters:
Sock vs Thiem
A Zverev vs Khachanov
Nishikori vs Federer
Cilic vs Djokovic
Defending champ Sock finally won back-to-back matches for the first time this season and is clinging on to his top 100 place - he was a bit lucky that Nadal withdrew and Jaziri entered the draw as a Lucky Loser.
Djokovic, Nadal, Federer, Del Potro, Zverev and Anderson have all secured their places in London for the ATP Finals. Cilic and Thiem most likely to join them although Nishikori can pass both if he wins the title in Paris. Mind, there are serious injury doubts over Rafa and Delpo and both will probably withdraw, so all 7 other names listed in this sentence will likely qualify along with Isner who is currently in 10th place.
15 year old Emma Raducanu has made the semi final of an ITF 25k event at The Wirral, beating 2 seeds along the way including someone ranked inside the top 200. She'll now be up to about 580 in the rankings. She has a winnable semi final and if she wins that she'll be just outside the top 500.
FFS I was just coming on this thread to ask you how I can find out which games Delpo is going to play in. I can only go to the tour on the Wednesady or Thursday night but Id only be interested in Delpo or Federer or Nadal
Thats really annoying as he is the one i want to see. Probably wont bother now but will look at the draw tomorrowYeah would be a shame to lose either of those to the likes of Isner but I'd be prepared.
Ah, I've just checked and Delpo is officially out now and 1st alt Nishikori is in. So it'll be Isner next if Nadal withdraws.
The draw is tomorrow night on the One Show so we'll see when they are due then.
Huge shame for Delpo, he has been largely injury free for a while now so this will be a blow, especially as his great run toward the end of 2017 just wasn't enough to get in last year.
Thats really annoying as he is the one i want to see. Probably wont bother now but will look at the draw tomorrow
Rafa officially out now and replaced by John Isner. So final line up:Thats really annoying as he is the one i want to see. Probably wont bother now but will look at the draw tomorrow
I'm going next Tuesday so kind of in the same boat although I guess they'd probably try and keep the more marquee names for the evening so I'm prepared for Anderson vs Cilic.
Anyone got any interest in that next gen Milan thing?
I take it Fabiano Caruana is a wild card at the next gen finals because he's nowhere near good enough to play. I don't know why wild cards are invited.
Tiafoe looks a very good player. Top 10 in the near future.Yeah, only has something like 45 ranking points this year. He came through a wildcard qualifying competition featuring 8 Italians, but if they insist on a wildcard then it would probably be better for the tournament if they just gave it to the highest ranked Italian instead of someone 600 odd competing with some players on the verge of the top 10.
Looking foward to this should be interestingYeah, only has something like 45 ranking points this year. He came through a wildcard qualifying competition featuring 8 Italians, but if they insist on a wildcard then it would probably be better for the tournament if they just gave it to the highest ranked Italian instead of someone 600 odd competing with some players on the verge of the top 10.
Looking foward to this should be interesting
I like the deciding point at 40-40, it creates a lot of pressure and opportunity at the same time. I agree with first to 4 games, why have best of 5 sets and then have first to 4. May as well just stick to normal best of 3 sets.A few thoughts on the 'innovations':
- Automatic hawk-eye - much prefer. Yes, it takes away the human element and the excitement of challenges, but realistically, I don't get how you can be mad at getting the right decision and it's instant as well, so not like VAR in football where they have to review. There's been too many wrong calls recently where the point had to be replayed when it needn't have been. Definite plus for me.
- Shot clock - fine, speeds the game up, so does the less warm up time.
- Towel rack - not a major issue. Fine, saves ball kids getting abuse, suppose there's the hygiene factor as well.
- No lets on serve - fine, a match can be decided on a net cord so not much difference there.
- No ad scoring - would prefer it left alone, but wouldn't be a disaster to me if they implemented this going forward. I do like the A-40-A-40 scoring, but this obviously speeds it up and can be exciting having match point or beak point simultaneously.
- Coaching - I'm not bothered either way. Maybe prefer not, but could live with it, but would prefer it to be universal one way or the other across the board - like at all men, women, slam matches etc. or not at all.
- 4 game sets - absolutely not, just doesn't feel right and just means if you get broken, the set is almost gone.
Yeah, it's been quite good so far. The Italian wildcard won an amazing point in the tie break earlier
I like the deciding point at 40-40, it creates a lot of pressure and opportunity at the same time. I agree with first to 4 games, why have best of 5 sets and then have first to 4. May as well just stick to normal best of 3 sets.