He’s not shite mind. Certainly been disappointing though.And yet he's utter f***ing shite at Premiership football.
What an absolute horrible fucker as well by the way!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s not shite mind. Certainly been disappointing though.And yet he's utter f***ing shite at Premiership football.
Gerrard, comfortably. Had everything. Goals, assists, range of passing, strong as an ox and could run all day.
Scholes is the ‘hipster’ choice.
Paul Scholes gets better the longer he's retired. He was good, and highly rated, but nobody spoke about him during his career like they do now.
They romanticize Scholes based on how good Barcelona became and how midfielders like Xavi and Iniesta showed you could be a great midfielder playing passes and dictating tempo etc, when 15-20 years ago people were looking at central midfielders from the perspective that they should be like Keane, Vieira, Lampard or Gerrard.
When I say "people" I mean the general public. Scholes always well thought of within the game. Only years later is the public perception shifting.
Scholes, absolute classWhich one of them were the best of the three and why?
Dont care if it's been done before.
Tell that to JH’s Premier League winning medal
Henderson can win the Premier League for the next 10 years..he's still not a better player than Gerrard.
sorry, but with the greatest of respect, what would a West Ham fan know about identifying quality players?
What is Marco Boogers up to these days? Rofl
People that used to say Scholes should start in front of the other two at the time? nobody.
People that say it now - almost everybody
I'm not saying Ginola did, the PFA did. And you are intimating that Scholes wasn't even second best, so you're still not helping your own case are you?!So Ginola with 3 goals and one assist deserved player of the year did he in a season when Beckham finished runner up to Rivaldo for the Balon dor
So Gerrard's better cos he takes pens![]()
ScholesWhich one of them were the best of the three and why?
Dont care if it's been done before.
ThisScholes is the choice of those who know about football. He is also the choice of people like Messi, Xavi, Ronaldo and Zidane (who called him the only great English midfielder).
Henderson
All 3 of them had more talent on one foot than Henderson, to even be mentioned in the same breath as them 3 is simply farcical.
As for who is the best of the 3 has the be Gerrard for me.