Scholes, Gerrard or Lampard


Status
Not open for further replies.
anyone got an Albanian to English dictionary?

Moore - 544 games for West Ham
Hurst - 411 games for West Ham
Peters - 302 games for West Ham
Ferdinand - 127 games for West Ham
Lampard - 148 games for West Ham

keep making things u[p maybe you could win twat of the week

Can’t have been that great - you’ve never finished higher than 3rd in the league and your greatest honour is winning something called the Southern Floodlit Cup in 1956 🤷‍♂️
 
Think they're all good in their own ways and if you were to analyse their skills and stats to form a total they'd all come out with virtually the same numbers.
 
Can’t have been that great - you’ve never finished higher than 3rd in the league and your greatest honour is winning something called the Southern Floodlit Cup in 1956 🤷‍♂️
hows your European trophy collection?


or trophy collection in your lifetime?
 
Which one of them were the best of the three and why?

Dont care if it's been done before.
Scholes. Absolute genius with a football. The other two don't even come close, and given how brilliant they were it tells you how good Scholes was. My favourite ever player
Scholes is the choice of those who know about football. He is also the choice of people like Messi, Xavi, Ronaldo and Zidane (who called him the only great English midfielder).
This
 
He's injured you lunatic. You're exceeding stupidity mate

What his whole time at United he's been injured? Give over you berk.

If we bought him and he was putting in the performances he has done for Man U, you'd be one of the first to complain man.

You think hes world class, I dont. End of.
 
Paul Scholes gets better the longer he's retired. He was good, and highly rated, but nobody spoke about him during his career like they do now.
They romanticize Scholes based on how good Barcelona became and how midfielders like Xavi and Iniesta showed you could be a great midfielder playing passes and dictating tempo etc, when 15-20 years ago people were looking at central midfielders from the perspective that they should be like Keane, Vieira, Lampard or Gerrard.
When I say "people" I mean the general public. Scholes always well thought of within the game. Only years later is the public perception shifting.

I honstly think people start thinking Scholes was better than he is when Xavi said he was his favourite player. Scholes was undoubtedly a quality player, yet he wasn't good enough to be the first choice in England's central midfield, often being pushed out on the left.
 
What his whole time at United he's been injured? Give over you berk.

If we bought him and he was putting in the performances he has done for Man U, you'd be one of the first to complain man.

You think hes world class, I dont. End of.
You're just making stuff up now. You said he was a shite PL player.
 
I honstly think people start thinking Scholes was better than he is when Xavi said he was his favourite player. Scholes was undoubtedly a quality player, yet he wasn't good enough to be the first choice in England's central midfield, often being pushed out on the left.

Think so. Players rated him, and rightly so, but the canonisation of him since retirement is a bit nauseating
 
Think so. Players rated him, and rightly so, but the canonisation of him since retirement is a bit nauseating
even so at the time - Balon D'or votes -

Steven Gerrard = 220 votes

- 2001 = 1 vote
- 2005 = 142 votes
- 2006 = 0 votes
- 2007 = 17 votes
- 2008 = 28 votes
- 2009 = 32 votes
Frank Lampard = 169 votes

- 2004 = 5 votes
- 2005 = 148 votes
- 2006 = 3 votes
- 2008 = 8 votes
- 2009 = 5 votes
Paul Scholes = 0 votes

- 2000 = 0 votes
- 2001 = 0 votes
- 2003 = 0 votes
- 2004 = 0 votes
- 2007 = 0 votes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top