Sayers Shooting trial



Well if you have no idea, why the fuck would you claim the trial is a farce.
There's no f***ing evidence man, the only thing linking Dixon to it has gone "missing"

Sayers is an utter bellend.
He claims that the police are constantly stitching him up whilst running around like a moron.

Can’t stand the dick me.

Can’t soeak for his family as I have never met them but John Henry is a clown.
Like trying to get him charged with rape whilst failing to disclose the victim said the rapist had tattoos and he's got none, they've been trying to stitch him up for years.
 
Last edited:
If you read the trial records there seems to be a lot of very exact evidence as records to mobile phone records. I'm don't know what the balance of overall proof would be required but some of it seems quite suspicious at first glance.
Its blatant mate
 
I got a warning for calling someone a sex tourist mate,do you think saying "X killed Viv Graham" wouldnt result in similar?
Don’t explain yourself mate - if the OP can’t work it out for himself then it’s not worth explaining :)

You know this how? How have you any idea what the evidence is?
He got the remand fact wrong mate, a fact that is in the public domain, so he clearly knows nothing that isn’t !
 

Back
Top