42
Striker
Most people, in order to save to a point of having it comfortable, in terms of, the trappings in their old age, would have to go without some stuff or give up a lot of the normal enjoyments.
And the car analogy is far from silly.
You are going by your well off nature, as it stands. This is not any real yardstick for the majority.
Most people can't even save. Most people who can't even save, are still in debt for various things.
However, a person has a choice.
Do you go without a washing machine and wash in the bath/sink until you save up enough to buy a washing machine, or do you borrow the money or finance the buying of the washer and actually make your life easier as is?
Here's a scenario.
A person of 20 who pays all but £30 out on bills for everything. Basically they have £30 to spend for themselves.
That person enjoys a £5 a week bet, a tin of baccy and a dozen cans, a week.
Someone tells them, if they go without those leisurely luxuries, they can save that £30 a week and in 40 years time, if saved regularly and doing without, they will have around £60,000 to do with as they want, at 60.
Imagine getting to 58 and finding you're dying or you become incapacitated.
Or just getting to 60 and having the ability to buy that merc or whatever, or go on a few holidays, eating all kinds of top notch food for however long it lasts.
Live for the time with a bit for a rainy day, if you can, without creating hardship or depriving yourself of your lesures you look forward to each day.
You're talking about someone on the bread line. They dont have much choice.
I'm talking about someone on what should be comfortable salary that enjoys a comfortable life, but choose a payday to payday lifestyle cos they 'have' to spend it