pwsafc
Striker
Never said I hadHave you actually seen the clubs accounts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never said I hadHave you actually seen the clubs accounts?
Brutal.You’re using what’s written in a newspaper article to prove why people shouldn’t believe newspaper articles. Well done.
What about the journalist in The Times who wrote the story?Is there any reason to believe Craig Hope from the Daily Mail rather than Stewart Donald?
Nobody has mentioned SD, Im sure hes not bothered, they have released there statement and fans can believe what ever they wantPoor Stewart is everyone picking on him again awwww, let’s see if sues this time, I doubt it though eh as accounts come out in 2 months
They didnt even answer some of the questions man. Total bluffersI give up people on here have there agenda against the owners so doesn't matter what they say, people will just believe articles in the papers. The truth will come out when they sell
How have they been called out? They have explained everything if people don't believe them that's upto them
They answered all the questions apart from stuff due to confidentiality agreementsThey didnt even answer some of the questions man. Total bluffers
And how do you know he has put millions back in.Never said I had
Fair enough. Hopefully that will quieten a few down on here![]()
Club statement
Following the recent reports published by the national press, Sunderland AFC today moved to clarify several points that have caused severe and unwarranted unrest within the club’s fan base.www.safc.com
You mean the massive Mag that hates Sunderland writing for a really bad newspaper?Is there any reason to believe Craig Hope from the Daily Mail rather than Stewart Donald?
NOFair enough. Hopefully that will quieten a few down on here
You mean the massive Mag that hates Sunderland writing for a really bad newspaper?
For the last time, he didn't write it. It was originally from The Times.Fair enough. Hopefully that will quieten a few down on here
You mean the massive Mag that hates Sunderland writing for a really bad newspaper?
Because it says in the interviewAnd how do you know he has put millions back in.
Right. But Donald said he paid £3m for the shares. Now it's just £1. So just because they said it in an interview doesn't mean it's true.Because it says in the interview
YESFor the last time, he didn't write it. It was originally from The Times.
He was very quick to pick up on it without checking the facts.For the last time, he didn't write it. It was originally from The Times.
Whatever, you don't believe them and believe the newspaper articles that your choice, its not mineRight. But Donald said he paid £3m for the shares. Now it's just £1. So just because they said it in an interview doesn't mean it's true.
YESOne word answers what a f***ing joke man.
![]()
Club statement
Following the recent reports published by the national press, Sunderland AFC today moved to clarify several points that have caused severe and unwarranted unrest within the club’s fan base.www.safc.com