SAFC response to latest stories


Status
Not open for further replies.
I think they just make it up as they go along.
I keep reading on here that Donald is a 'nice bloke'. Watching the recent Netflix shows, it does seem that way. However what really comes across is that he is so obviously not capable of running the club at all. Completely out of his depth.

The playing squad is nowhere near capable enough to compete in The Championship. As for Donald, League One is too big for him.
 
Whatever you carry on believe the papers, the truth will come out when they sell club

To be honest I don't think it will. Most business deals are completed with non disclosure or confidentiality agreements. Football will be no different to that.

Think about all the ex managers we've had and not one of them will openly criticise the club. PDC for example is amazingly complimentary about us. Not a co-incidence I think.
 
To be honest I don't think it will. Most business deals are completed with non disclosure or confidentiality agreements. Football will be no different to that.

Think about all the ex managers we've had and not one of them will openly criticise the club. PDC for example is amazingly complimentary about us. Not a co-incidence I think.
It will more than likely come out as too how much they paid for the club
 
FPP are a ‘key partner’ to Madrox. The only positive out of all of that
That requires an assumption that a) they would want to own the club b) they won't sell the ground and training facilities c) they would invest d) they would be responsible owners. All big ifs for me.

Current owners are a busted flush but "just anybody" isn't what is needed.
 
Well those journos already had to put a written apology in the paper for getting facts wrong before
Who? The only paper that did was The Sun. The Times ran a story about Methven insulting our fans and he had to come out and explain it.

The Mail ran a story about how Donald ran the club. That lend to Donald have to explain the takeover and change his story.

So the 2 papers have challenged the club and the had to back footed.
 
Who? The only paper that did was The Sun. The Times ran a story about Methven insulting our fans and he had to come out and explain it.

The Mail ran a story about how Donald ran the club. That lend to Donald have to explain the takeover and change his story.

So the 2 papers have challenged the club and the had to back footed.
So the sun has had to apologise as I've just said!!! Now this article which has seen documents about the 20mill written off the club is in financial trouble
 
That they've been found out?
Don’t know tbh.

if they wanted to hide the fact about the £20m I read on here by people that know better than me that it could have done.
I’m as unhappy as anyone with SAFC and the football being served up over the last god knows how many years mate it’s just my View is we all wanted an explanation ASAP and we got it.
 
So the sun has had to apologise as I've just said!!! Now this article which has seen documents about the 20mill written off the club is in financial trouble
Firstly, it never said financial trouble. It claimed the £20m hole is putting off buyers. Kieran Maguire who saw the documents said it was a financial mess.

The stories are about the dishonesty of the owners. They've lied to the fans. Donald told us Sartori paid £3m for 20% of the club but it was £1. Just like he said he paid £40m for the club. He only paid £15m and used the clubs own money to pay the rest.
 
They couldnt even be arsed to draft the entire response into the statement.

Just a ‘heres a link to what we said to the Echo’

Utter shite.
Giving them a huge benefit of the doubt I can only think they saw the criticism of the Echo article being long winded and not really clearing things up and they wanted to get to the point.

But it does come across as bring written by someone who had to be out the door to catch a bus in the rain cos their mate had dropped them in it with a lift home.
 
Firstly, it never said financial trouble. It claimed the £20m hole is putting off buyers. Kieran Maguire who saw the documents said it was a financial mess.

The stories are about the dishonesty of the owners. They've lied to the fans. Donald told us Sartori paid £3m for 20% of the club but it was £1. Just like he said he paid £40m for the club. He only paid £15m and used the clubs own money to pay the rest.
And they are paying that money back, satori has also put millions into the club according to the clubs statement. Not sure why this place is so obsessed about finances of a football club. Especially whhen no-one on here has a clue exactly what is happening
 
And they are paying that money back, satori has also put millions into the club according to the clubs statement. Not sure why this place is so obsessed about finances of a football club. Especially whhen no-one on here has a clue exactly what is happening
Have you actually seen the clubs accounts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top