42
Striker
So I'm a lower rate tax payer and was advised by FA in a free consultation to go SIPP rather than S&S.
Was beginning to doubt this but doing a simple calculation of putting in 10k a year for 5 years and assuming 4% growth and only calculating the 25% of sipp being tax free, then I've worked out I'll be about 4.5k better off in a sipp. Over 10years that would be 9k better. That was quite quick working out but does it sound about right to you knowledgeable folks
Thinking that with hopefully more growth and possibly able to offset some of the remaining 75% of the sipp with my tax allowance then I'm thinking for me sipp is definitely financially better. We do have about money in S&S already as that was my original plan till speaking to the FA.
Hoping to go in between 8-10 years somewhere around 60 and bridging gap till I get state and civil service pension at 67. Could take working pension early but would like to plan on having option not to as you loose quite a bit (although this is a calculation I'll do nearer the time.)
It depends on what your annual civil service pension will be & how much you'll draw down from other pension, and where it all fits in with tax. If you're taking SIPP first & deferring CS pension until SPA then you probably won't pay any or very little tax on the SIPP as you get you're 12,570 personal allowance as well as the 25% tax free. However if you do this, you will then pay a lot more tax on your CS pension, so it's swings & roundabouts.