Nil desperandum
Striker
Just leave it to Lineker and Shearer to spout off about it and hopefully receive their cards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There would have been plea and case management hearing(s) where the defence set out their case and the prosecution set out there cases. Initial evidence is usually set out well before the trial, and he would have been served with the prosecution case months ago (one would expect)... If you were employing someone up for those offences wouldn't you ask to see a copy of the cps' initial serving of evidence and disclosures?Nothing of note I imagine, just to confirm name and such. Club muist have sat down with him at some point
I'd imagine it would be a quick confirmation of name and address and as was reported a not guilty plea. No more than that
Well said.Lets forget about him and concentrate and be fully focussed on the players and staff that remain
I think this is a valid point tbh. Not arsed about a statement but I would be interested to know if there is a case for the club to be recompensed for the wages spent whilst they had possibly been lied to in regard to the not guilty pleaCould be doing with some clarification regarding who knew what and when - after this is all sorted, not during, obviously. The info in the public domain suggests the club were lied to and would have a decent case against the player. How much in wages has been paid out during the time this has gone on?
Lack of logic and common sense is rife on here, mixed in with the odd village idiot.
Recipe for disaster.
We have some right f***ing idiots on this board.
You've just noticed
F*cking hell man, who the f*ck do you think your are....? is there any need...?
I asked a legitimate question, all you had to do say was NO...
The f***ing keyboard warriors on here are ridiculous at times...
true, but tbh i find their levels of thickness quite amusing
There would have been plea and case management hearing(s) where the defence set out their case and the prosecution set out there cases. Initial evidence is usually set out well before the trial, and he would have been served with the prosecution case months ago (one would expect)... If you were employing someone up for those offences wouldn't you ask to see a copy of the cps' initial serving of evidence and disclosures?
Ah, you like things to be black and whiteIt's about being seen to do the right thing for me. Another similarity is the fella involved in the Glasgow crash a couple of Christmases ago - he knew he wasn't fit to drive but lied to his employers about it. The evidence we're seeing won't have just appeared yesterday, he'll have known he was bang to rights very early on in the process. He's then told the club he's completely innocent. If he'd told the truth he'd have been sacked the day he was charged.
How is this looking for negatives? I firmly believe the club have been exemplary here. What I don't want is any grey area.
I think this is a valid point tbh. Not arsed about a statement but I would be interested to know if there is a case for the club to be recompensed for the wages spent whilst they had possibly been lied to in regard to the not guilty plea
He should have been suspended and remained suspended until after the trial had reached the full conclusion. Unsuspending and playing him then sacking him on day one of the trial does nobody any favours
That'll catch one or twoI'm a superb poster when not winding up the simpletons.
Mmmmmm, I see what you are saying, but I'm getting a bit uncomfortable with what is being said around the WWW. I think once proceedings are finished, the club needs to say a bit more.
Stop swearing Jim...I think I've made it quite obvious...
Mmmmmm, I see what you are saying, but I'm getting a bit uncomfortable with what is being said around the WWW. I think once proceedings are finished, the club needs to say a bit more.
Stop swearing Jim...I think I've made it quite obvious...
Very succinct and to the pointIt's not as if there's anything more to know. He transgressed, he was caught and he's been sacked. That's it. Prurient interest, nothing more.
Hopefully their "spouting off" consists of something along the lines of "A great win to round off what's been an awful week" - I'm sure BBC's legal people will keep them right.Just leave it to Lineker and Shearer to spout off about it and hopefully receive their cards.
Read the tabloids and the inevitable book when it comes out. SAFC no longer involved. Look elsewhere for your thrills.Knob.
At this point in time, possibly...?