ajthemackem
Striker
Doesn't need to be intent for a red.No intent at all. Clutching at straws asking for a red.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't need to be intent for a red.No intent at all. Clutching at straws asking for a red.
Since when was intent a condition for a foul/card in football?No intent at all. Clutching at straws asking for a red.
Since when was intent a condition for a foul/card in football?
Source?
www.readytogo.net
It's a red; undue force; endangering an opponent etc..
That shot shows the ball has travelled about two feet on from where Dennis headed it, so about one-twentieth of a second after contact. The goalie's arm is bent, and perhaps that is a recoil effect because he has already made contact. Given that Cirkin's head is still vertical, it looks more like Long is about to follow through and straighten his arm, so his attempt to get the ball is very, very late: so late that it is arguably deliberate. It even could be seen as Actual Bodily Harm, but it would be hard to make that charge stick for a single punch. That team didn't seem to have any qualms about smashing people up all over the rest of the pitch anyway (or diving about feigning injury). Maybe what was deliberate was the manager's tactics?
The EFL should take some action on the incident, and the FA should be looking at the rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64435571
I hope you're feeling better today Dennis.
If Patto had one the same you lot wouldn’t Nat an eye lid. Keepers get protection and that’s just football. Get over it.
We'll get a suspension if we complainShould be a red retrospectively, but I bet it doesn't happen...
He wasn't in need of protection. He recklessly endangered an opponent by going fist first into a melee at chest height. Look up the definition of serious foul play.
I get what you’re saying but a keeper punches balls clear at all heights every single game. It’s not as black and white as reading a rule book. If Cirkin hadn’t been brave the keeper punches it clear and it’s a good clearance. It’s unfortunate but shit happens. We scored. Cirkin is fine, we move on.
Players make tackles every game.
When the tackle endangers an opponent then it is a red card juat like punching somebody in the face should be.
Not for me. He’s trying to punch the ball away, as he’s entitled to do, and Cirkin gets there ahead of him. It’s in the same category as a clash of heads for me.
For their keeper when Cirkin scored.
Should a clash of heads be a red card? That can be really really dangerous.Players make tackles every game.
When the tackle endangers an opponent then it is a red card juat like punching somebody in the face should be.
Not for me. He’s trying to punch the ball away, as he’s entitled to do, and Cirkin gets there ahead of him. It’s in the same category as a clash of heads for me.
Should a clash of heads be a red card? That can be really really dangerous.
We can go around and round in circles forever, unfortunately keepers always seem to the get the benefit of doubt. It’s done man, nothing is going to come of it. Move on.
I’m yet to see it. Cahill nearly killed Ryan Mason.A clash of heads can be a red card if one of the players goes in late and uses excessive force.
I’m yet to see it. Cahill nearly killed Ryan Mason.
For me you could take that to extremes. Aka the Son Red Card at Everton or the Struijk one at Leeds, refereeing entirely on outcome. Accidents will always happen. For me that was just a nasty clash, definitely a penalty but not a Red Card.Just because you hardly ever see it doesn't mean it can't happen.
If you use excessive force and endanger your opponent then a referee can send you off. It doesn't matter if it's for a clash of heads, a keepers punch or a tackle.