Reasons to keep Steve Bruce as manager thread


Status
Not open for further replies.
There has been a nuclear leak and Steve Bruce and Lawrie Sanchez are the only managers still alive.
 
He has no more potential than a boat with a big hole in the bottom. he's a money pit

:lol: You can criticise him for many things but that certainly ain't one of them......when the logical brain has abandoned it's masters head it can only mean one thing....

Logon or register to see this image
 
Decent first season, shipped the deadwood well and moved us on a little. Started the second season very well until injuries and the loss of our goalscorer saw us falter. I'd most certainly stick with him, see how he performs next season. If he stumbles along with a full squad in his third year get shot.

What a sensible answer. I fully agree
 
:lol: You can criticise him for many things but that certainly ain't one of them......when the logical brain has abandoned it's masters head it can only mean one thing....

Logon or register to see this image

Instead of trying to be a clever cunt, why don't you give specific examples of players he's signed who have added more to the team than the price he paid for them. Then balance it out against the players he's let go form nothing and those who he signed who have barely played.

If you accept the talk of signing 9 players or so, is there evidence during his time here that he's the man to trust these kind of decisions with?
 
Decent first season, shipped the deadwood well and moved us on a little. Started the second season very well until injuries and the loss of our goalscorer saw us falter. I'd most certainly stick with him, see how he performs next season. If he stumbles along with a full squad in his third year get shot.

Don't you think the staff he employed, players he signed and the selection choices Bruce has made have had any influence on the injuries we've encountered?

I have said on many occasions that I blame the club for Bent leaving, but I know I'm in the minority and that's a can of worms that isn't for opening up here (again).
 
Instead of trying to be a clever cunt, why don't you give specific examples of players he's signed who have added more to the team than the price he paid for them. Then balance it out against the players he's let go form nothing and those who he signed who have barely played.

If you accept the talk of signing 9 players or so, is there evidence during his time here that he's the man to trust these kind of decisions with?

No need to be getting abusive man :lol: ...jesus enjoying your weekend are ya? christ...

Bent- profit of between 6-14 million depending on adds on on our side/spurs/villa...

Mig - gonna be a great keeper - Bargain
Bramble - Bargain
Sess - Bargain
Gyan - gonna be a great player here - Bargain
Turner/Cattermole..... hampered with injuries...look good when they're fit...this season has been a write off for both...payed the right prices for them though...

...the development of Henderson and Colback under Bruce will have added considerable value to them......


..there off top of my head...don't know why I bother replying to such an ignorant post though...
 
:lol: You can criticise him for many things but that certainly ain't one of them......when the logical brain has abandoned it's masters head it can only mean one thing....

Logon or register to see this image
Do you understand what we mean by the term 'kneejerk'? It's an involuntary rhythmc response to external stimuli. Bruce has spent millions and hasn't got anthing remotely resembling a football team to show for it. This failing has been evident over two seasons so I can only presume that you are a bit muddled over what the word means. :confused:
 
Do you understand what we mean by the term 'kneejerk'? It's an involuntary rhythmc response to external stimuli. Bruce has spent millions and hasn't got anthing remotely resembling a football team to show for it. This failing has been evident over two seasons so I can only presume that you are a bit muddled over what the word means. :confused:

Show me the net spend...
 
No need to be getting abusive man :lol: ...jesus enjoying your weekend are ya? christ...

Bent- profit of between 6-14 million depending on adds on on our side/spurs/villa...

Mig - gonna be a great keeper - Bargain
Bramble - Bargain
Sess - Bargain
Gyan - gonna be a great player here - Bargain
Turner/Cattermole..... hampered with injuries...look good when they're fit...this season has been a write off for both...payed the right prices for them though...

...the development of Henderson and Colback under Bruce will have added considerable value to them......


..there off top of my head...don't know why I bother replying to such an ignorant post though...

Mignolet is looking like Fulop Mk II
 
No need to be getting abusive man :lol: ...jesus enjoying your weekend are ya? christ...

Bent- profit of between 6-14 million depending on adds on on our side/spurs/villa...

Mig - gonna be a great keeper - Bargain
Bramble - Bargain
Sess - Bargain
Gyan - gonna be a great player here - Bargain
Turner/Cattermole..... hampered with injuries...look good when they're fit...this season has been a write off for both...payed the right prices for them though...

...the development of Henderson and Colback under Bruce will have added considerable value to them......


..there off top of my head...don't know why I bother replying to such an ignorant post though...

I think stupid smilies and daft picture are ignorant myself. Don't really agree with the transfers either, but at least you bothered to try and explain yourself.
 
Mignolet is looking like Fulop Mk II

Still though he's played way more than would of been initially expected of him.... keepers that age are very rarely starters in the prem and for good reason. Did you see Kusazk (sp) today for United? A level way below where Mig is at....

....He has the attributes to be a great keeper in a few years. Earned call ups to Belgium first team this year and looked good every time he played with them. It's foolish to be talking down Mig when he's only 22...a great find by the club but obviously not first choice for a few years.

like city did with Hart last season we should loan him out next season imo...
 
If the Chairman and owner are convinced:
a) we will get to the root of the injury problems and sort it out
b) we will finish above the likes of Stoke, West Brom and Newcastle
c) we will compete for a European place right until the end of the season

- and we can do that with SB, then we should keep him.
 
Show me the net spend...
So you're saying that Ellis Short has kept Bruce barefoot & that's why he's failed as a manager? Are you masterminding a 'Short out!' campaign? Was Bent sold from underneath Bruce and against his will?

I'm not having any of that. Bruce has failed to put a team together & he's had enough money to do so-far more money than the manager of our visitors today was given, when he was at the helm at the SoL!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top