Reasons to keep Steve Bruce as manager thread


Status
Not open for further replies.
im saying youre a very negative person, or at least poster.

yes i think hes been good for us, done a much better job than any manager since peter reid before he lost it.
I'm listing Bruce's many failures and you haven't been able to nay-say any of them. It's a popular misconception (that is used as the idiom in many replies posted to me) to say that 'stubber is negative'. It avoids the need to rationalise your argument & gives you an easy escape.

Brucie's failures far outweigh his plusses and you are unable to demonstrate otherwise. Instead you resort to the 'stubber is negative' card. :lol: I could always adopt a new name I suppose, like Mackay et al.
 
Last edited:
Think another season will give a fairer telling of his potential with us....the injuries this season make it impossible to be an accurate judge. We were cruising, challenging for Europe in January.... we shouldn't forget that too quickly. I wasn't happy to see him given a contract extension but I'm certainly happy to see the guy get another season....
 
im saying youre a very negative person, or at least poster.

yes i think hes been good for us, done a much better job than any manager since peter reid before he lost it.
Keane brought us up and kept us up, in two seasons with even more money I'd of expected to be in this position with Keane anyway.

We haven't progressed under Bruce to any acceptable level.
 
I'm listing Bruce's many failures and you haven't been able to nay-say any of them. It's a popular misconception (that is used as the idiom in many replies posted to me) to say that 'stubber is negative'. It avoids the need to rationalise your argument & gives you an easy escape.

Brucie's failures far outweigh his plusses and you are unable to demonstrate otherwise. Instead you resort to the 'stubber is negative' card. :lol: I could always adopt a new name I suppose, like Mackay et al.

you listed some negatives and i said fair enough. i listed some positives and you ignored them
 
Think another season will give a fairer telling of his potential with us....the injuries this season make it impossible to be an accurate judge. We were cruising, challenging for Europe in January.... we shouldn't forget that too quickly. I wasn't happy to see him given a contract extension but I'm certainly happy to see the guy get another season....
He has no more potential than a boat with a big hole in the bottom. he's a money pit.
 
He's had two years, he's signed a team of midgets, can't design a team, can't motivate and we still are the whipping bys of the Premier League. Relegation next season under him. By the way, the kids don't look good enough at the moment and to answer another question, we now know why Riveros hasn't played.

Let's not hang about, it's time that Bruce was out.
 
Decent first season, shipped the deadwood well and moved us on a little. Started the second season very well until injuries and the loss of our goalscorer saw us falter. I'd most certainly stick with him, see how he performs next season. If he stumbles along with a full squad in his third year get shot.
 
Decent first season, shipped the deadwood well and moved us on a little. Started the second season very well until injuries and the loss of our goalscorer saw us falter. I'd most certainly stick with him, see how he performs next season. If he stumbles along with a full squad in his third year get shot.


Far too sensible.
 
that doesnt take into account injuries and luck..

the qualtiy of the side is the quality of the side.

youd sooner have whitehead than cattermole? or jones than gyan or delap than sessegnon just because of the table?

well therefore as we have better players than Stoke for example they clearly have a better manager than us...there lies the problem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top