Conflicting stories here, like.
iirc he was on the podium introducing them all the other day!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conflicting stories here, like.
Define 2nd handSo you weren't in the meeting and heard all this second hand?
I reckon hes also still around the club after that statement today.That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
I have with Ghandi Floss, but it was at Doncaster, I can't remember word for word
Erm you weren't there and heard what happened from someone else who was. Meaning it may not have been the truth which seems to be the case given your account has been disputed by someone who was.Define 2nd hand
Define 2nd hand
That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
Correct mateI reckon hes also still around the club after that statement today.
Pr move to say hes gone?
So after we talked on the bus, do you still believe the RAWA speak for the many or just for the RAWA ?It certainly wasn’t asked again and again, and barely any questions were asked before he came out with some of his injudicious comments about the knowledge of our fans, and also about us being difficult towards owners/managers/etc... No one pushed him on the Non-Disclosure side of things, as no one there was stupid enough not to understand what it means.
There was definitely nothing majorly note worthy said, and he’s obviously paid for it by leaving the role.
I don’t think any fans should be adding to the narrative that RAWA are out to get them, they’re just normal lads from Sunderland who are trying to do what they think is the right thing.
Correct mate
Divnt ban me then!
This was from one of the minutes of meetings I seen from a branch member, roughly a few weeks before Xmas. I’m not sure if it was the one Methven was rumoured to have took the strop. Anyway, that was one of his quotes along with that our fans put a negative spin on things and turn it childlike, which has an effect on future investment. He also went on to say that there is a significant problem with Sunderland fans, and we are known in the game to be an issue and it isn’t attractive to future investors. He needs the help to tackle the “Sunderland disease”
Sound like CharlieTypical replies from people who appear to be of low intelligence and cannot string sentences together unless they are showing their ignorance, they should remember the saying" It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt". I expect they are off to schoo; now
Correct mate
So after we talked on the bus, do you still believe the RAWA speak for the many or just for the RAWA ?
Some think it was uncalled for and has caused more harm than good, your view please
I have with Ghandi Floss, but it was at Doncaster, I can't remember word for word.
I also heard it from a different side. Also it was discussed on Saturday by another guy who was there, and he gave a different account.
Can we just adopt the default position that 99.9% of the time bob the mad talks bollocks..the clue is in his username!I never put anyone on ignore as i like to have a sense of where the village idiots are !Hang on a minute. In this same paragraph you say you've seen them with Ghandi then said you've heard it. Which is it?
It didn't stop them investing did it? But I do believe they were incredibly naive when they arrived and underestimated the passion that we have for the club.
We can be negative, but that "negative spin" is just really something I see online and by a relatively small percentage of the supporters. I think on the whole the fans are incredibly supportive - are we disgruntled and unhappy about being in the "3rd Division" and at the lowest point in our 100+ year history - of course we are. But if things are going well you won't find a better bunch anywhere!
I reckon hes also still around the club after that statement today.
Pr move to say hes gone?
I would like to think we have a great reputation for when things are going badly ‘things can only get better’ was only a few years ago, who can forget how we supported the club in relegation in 77, 91, 97, at the Wembley before last season in the face of adversity we have been the most humble of fans. The sheer number that fans attending matches.
Yes there are some cynical vocal miserable sods who drain the positivity from the team and other supporters(the original mood hoovers) but on the whole the fans remain the greatest asset.
Methven blames the fans as a deflection tool, much like Bruce. Truth is fans are being treated with contempt and a lack of respect. These guys thought they could bullshit the fans and they would accept it. They called that very badly, but will now blame the fans for everything which is why I did not agree with what I think was a naive action by the supporters groups. It was a no win, they were looking to sell anyway, but have now given them the excuse to remove any moral obligations.
I also think that if we were going to protest it should have been to Short, he put us here. Attacking SD and co at every opportunity seems bizarre and we have only done because he has no money. If he was a multi billionaire we would not. have. So yes some fans were unfair and acted unreasonable but that should have been insignificant to them. There was a much bigger picture
Berb with yet another own goalThat’s utter bullshit. It was me who asked the financial question only once, before he came out with the comments about northerners not understanding investment/business.
I told you this myself.
Not sure what you are trying to gain by making things up, and shitstirring, mate?