RAWA & Methven Minutes


Status
Not open for further replies.
It might contradict the club's "great meetings, everyone happy" patter, given the second meeting only occurred because of the kick off at the first one.
It might but does it need contradicting ? It's tomorrow's chip wrapper, I don't know why anybody would care about it, who does this need to be communicated to ?

It looks like Donald is packing his bags which is the main thing. He's just trying to protect his reputation, but they all do that.
 
To be fair I don't think there's much point. @Ghandi Floss has already said that there wasn't any "smoking gun". There's nothing awful that could affect the future of the club. From what I remember he basically said it was a frank, slightly heated but not adversarial, exchange of views. Methven then apparently made a couple of ill-advised comments but he's left the board now so I don't see what we gain by dragging them up. From what we've heard previously it sounds like people think there's a lot more to these minutes than is actually the case
Thats why they need to be published if im being honest !people will just make shit up otherwise!
 
Typical replies from people who appear to be of low intelligence and cannot string sentences together unless they are showing their ignorance, they should remember the saying" It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt". I expect they are off to schoo; now
Wha?
 
I have seen them, Charlie lost his rag because 1 guy kept pushing on a financial aspect he was told several times about the non disclosure, but he kept blabbing on so CM blasted off its been blown out of all proportion. IMHO

As horrible as his comments were towards your fellow fans, you aren't half going a long way to proving his point with that stance. Bewildering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SVU
I have seen them, Charlie lost his rag because 1 guy kept pushing on a financial aspect he was told several times about the non disclosure, but he kept blabbing on so CM blasted off its been blown out of all proportion. IMHO

That’s utter bullshit. It was me who asked the financial question only once, before he came out with the comments about northerners not understanding investment/business.
I told you this myself.
Not sure what you are trying to gain by making things up, and shitstirring, mate?
 
May i say that these organisations, who appear to comprise of people full of their own importance, do not speak for me or the branch of which I am chairman. Who do they think they are demanding this and that get behind the club and give them your full support, I speak as a supporter who saw his first game in 1957 and got his first season ticket in1973.
Release your own statement from the Branch saying you want him to stay if you're that put out by it.
 
That’s utter bullshit. It was me who asked the financial question only once, before he came out with the comments about northerners not understanding investment/business.
I told you this myself.
Not sure what you are trying to gain by making things up, and shitstirring, mate?
That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
 
That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
You said you'd seen the minutes.
 
That’s utter bullshit. It was me who asked the financial question only once, before he came out with the comments about northerners not understanding investment/business.
I told you this myself.
Not sure what you are trying to gain by making things up, and shitstirring, mate?
Sycophant and fantasist. I wouldn't give his pap much credence, truthfully.
 
losing his rag and had a go at fans in general and not just one bloke.
Not just fans. Everyone in the region iirc
That’s utter bullshit. It was me who asked the financial question only once, before he came out with the comments about northerners not understanding investment/business.
I told you this myself.
Not sure what you are trying to gain by making things up, and shitstirring, mate?
:lol: gerrin lad!
 
That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
So you weren't in the meeting and heard all this second hand?
 
That's what I got from him mate, you did say you asked A question I also heard it was asked again and again, I also said, and you agreed there was nothing of real interest or disaster in the minutes, is that correct ? From what I understand he said we did not understand the non disclosure arrangement or its content, and he could and would not comment on it, and us northerners were not up to speed understanding it's content, or those in the meeting were not, is that correct?.
If I am wrong I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong.
At the end of the day he paid for his comments by leaving. And for more than 1 reason it is.his loss.
You said you've see the comments bob, now you're asking if what you've been told is right :lol:

I dont mind you but haway
 
You said you'd seen the minutes.
I have with Ghandi Floss, but it was at Doncaster, I can't remember word for word.
I also heard it from a different side. Also it was discussed on Saturday by another guy who was there, and he gave a different account.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top