Put a flat earthier into space

[What A Waster]

I just know because I've done experiments.

Alright mate. I've put the bit in huge bold text where you said you've done experiments about superfluid.

Post in thread 'Put a flat earthier into space'
Put a flat earthier into space



I just know because I've done experiments.

For complete clarity.

Didn't see this.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

As I said earlier, Earth should be a cratered mess if the moon is what we are told, a meteor-cratered rock.
Not to mention the craters of the moon would not look like we see if angled so-called space rock came into it.

And as you were told earlier but chose to ignore, Earth has an atmosphere which deflects some and causes others to burn up. Those that do reach ground can leave craters, some are still visible, some are hidden by water, vegetation or erosion.

Remember we wouldn't be talking about lobbing a rock onto the beach we would be talking about angling a rock throw in a straight trajectory that would not leave a perfectly circular crater. It would leave a skim and then a pushed-up mound to one part, like digging an angled tunnel in a small hill.

Only in your version of the world where there is no gravity and no-one can quite grasp the scale of things.

And what is a robust challenge?

Your 'not entirely flat but definitely not a globe' theory would be a robust challenge to the global model if...

1. It gave alternative explanations for all that's observed
2. Provided evidence for those alternative explanations
3. Gave details of repeatable experiments which could demonstrate/support/explain the claims made
4. Made any sense

You have failed on every level

 

[legend7]

And as you were told earlier but chose to ignore, Earth has an atmosphere which deflects some and causes others to burn up. Those that do reach ground can leave craters, some are still visible, some are hidden by water, vegetation or erosion.

Only in your version of the world where there is no gravity and no-one can quite grasp the scale of things.

Your 'not entirely flat but definitely not a globe' theory would be a robust challenge to the global model if...

1. It gave alternative explanations for all that's observed
2. Provided evidence for those alternative explanations
3. Gave details of repeatable experiments which could demonstrate/support/explain the claims made
4. Made any sense

You have failed on every level

Water level

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Water level

Dammit I always forget the water level. If only my mind was unhindered.

 

[legend7]

Dammit I always forget the water level. If only my mind was unhindered.

Tbf it's another level he failed at

 

[What A Waster]

A glossary for this thread would be a great read. Proper funny.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Post #7198, you responded to @What A Waster that you have done experiments

I'm still waiting for the full quote of where I mentioned myself experimenting on superfluids.

 

[What A Waster]

I'm still waiting for the full quote of where I mentioned myself experimenting on superfluids.

It's in big bold text

 

[Nukehasslefan]

How’s it bullying?

It isn't and I won't use it.
I accept what comes my way because I'm outside the box.

Aye , I've dipped in and out over the length and time of the thread. I'm not calling anyone a bully, more just saying anyone else talking rubbish would soon be ignored, this lad is either a genius and can see things that no-one else can, or he is a bit simple and should be left alone.

The best bits are the beautiful photographs from outer space, and of outer space. And also the information from people who know the world is ......













Flat. Ha

Aye and then there are these ones.
I do agree they are impressive.
The issue is in finding out what is real and what is not.

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

The issue is in finding out what is real and what is not.

Those who want to find out would do the experiments.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Alright mate. I've put the bit in huge bold text where you said you've done experiments about superfluid.

Didn't see this.

Show me the entire quote where I answer your superfluid and me say I had personally done experiments on superfluids.
I've done many experiments and I've watched people do many experiments.

 

[What A Waster]

Show me the entire quote where I answer your superfluid and me say I had personally done experiments on superfluids.
I've done many experiments and I've watched people do many experiments.

Just click on the arrow on the quote, it's quicker for you and me.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

And as you were told earlier but chose to ignore, Earth has an atmosphere which deflects some and causes others to burn up. Those that do reach ground can leave craters, some are still visible, some are hidden by water, vegetation or erosion.

Only in your version of the world where there is no gravity and no-one can quite grasp the scale of things.

Your 'not entirely flat but definitely not a globe' theory would be a robust challenge to the global model if...

1. It gave alternative explanations for all that's observed.....TICK.
2. Provided evidence for those alternative explanations.....TICK.
3. Gave details of repeatable experiments which could demonstrate/support/explain the claims made.....TICK.
4. Made any sense.....TICK.

You have failed on every level....CR0SS.

 

[Kevj]

Show me the entire quote where I answer your superfluid and me say I had personally done experiments on superfluids.
I've done many experiments and I've watched people do many experiments.

“You do the difficult work for me”

Put a flat earthier into space

Jesus....over 7000 posts on this bollox....:lol: I assume, Nukehasslefan is on a huge wind up......no other explanation.

www.readytogo.net

Third time of posting this now.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Just click on the arrow on the quote, it's quicker for you and me.

Still waiting.

 

[What A Waster]

Still waiting.

Are you an ostrich?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Those who want to find out would do the experiments.

Which ones have you done to prove a spinning globe and space and whatnot?

Are you an ostrich?

Are you?

 

[What A Waster]

Which ones have you done to prove a spinning globe and space and whatnot?

Are you?

Yes.

The quote has been shown to you but now you're not acknowledging it because you've got yourself tangled in your lies again.

You definitely said you'd done superfluid expriements and now you'll try and distract by not acknowledging it.

 

[Kevj]

I suspect I may be on ignore. Imagine a flat earth conspiracy nutjob actively avoiding facts when gifted to them on a platter. With gold sprinkles.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Which ones have you done to prove a spinning globe and space and whatnot?

Same ones I've already explained to you in this thread.

Look at the sky, notice how what you see 'appears' to move. Notice how those 'apparent' movements appear to change throughout the year. Learn to find the Pole Star. Look at sunrise and sunset and compare the 'apparent' motion of the Sun with that of the stars. Look at shadows, before, during and after an equinox.

Those are all things you 'could' do if you were really looking for the truth rather than simply clinging to the idea that the whole world is lying to you to stop you finding that river of gold and a few magic gems.

There's another equinox coming up soon, get started. I expect you still have your bowl and cocktail sticks from yesterdays demonstration of perpendicular towers, that's all you need.