Ah the 'nice story' dismissal. There is a lot of evidence for historic much higher meteor activity (including a rather large one here 65 million years ago) but if you decide to dismiss it all then you are left with no evidence.
There's a story and that's all it is. There are no facts and you know it.
That is one of the problems, you dismiss all evidence you don't understand or doesn't fit your fantasy, so can never see the side of reality.
I can level that back to you.
Ah the 'nice story' dismissal.
It is what it really is and until you can back that up as fact then you are reading a story based on what you're told as factual and nothing more.
You're more than welcome to reel it off to me and claim it as fact but you also should understand that I will not take it as that.
There is a lot of evidence for historic much higher meteor activity (including a rather large one here 65 million years ago) but if you decide to dismiss it all then you are left with no evidence.
There is no evidence of 65 million-year-old meteor strikes, only what you're told by the storytellers who claim it without evidence.
That is one of the problems, you dismiss all evidence you don't understand or doesn't fit your fantasy, so can never see the side of reality.
I dismiss lots of stuff and I accept lots of stuff. I believe certain stuff, so it's not all one way, it just seems it because you think not believing in a globe and the stuff that supposedly offers some kind of fact is me not believing anything or accepting anything, which is wide of the mark.
No a meteor strike would not have to be at skimming angle. Look at the scale image posted yesterday. Can you really not see all the possible angles the moon can be hit from?
The word
angle tells you enough.
It is your lack of comprehension of the scale of the world and beyond that is letting you down.
Nahhh, not at all.
The earth has weather systems and is volcanically active, as well as being covered in tidal oceans. While some craters exist, this constant erosion plus build up of soil matter, etc constantly changes and hides older crater impacts. Some have been discovered using ground penetrating radar. Such findings are published regularly.
There are plenty of indentations in the ground but there's no factual evidence for them being space meteors.
As I said earlier, the moon is still being hit and with it being a popular imaging target for amateur astronomers, it is not uncommon for an average person with a few hundred quid of kit to image it. Do the googling I have said and you will find lots of accounts.
So you regularly see meteors hit the moon, right?
Or do amateurs supposedly do?
Or is it the big wigs that only see them and tell us about it?
You will probably ignore this question, but have you ever pointed a telescope to the moon and studied it's craters, mapping them out and checking against guides? How would you know if new craters have appeared or not? Is this an area you have studied?
You must be logged on to see external links
I haven't fully studied the image, have you?
Yes you do. Your whole lemon squeezer model of the earth and your 8" per mile squared (wrong!) rule is from there, yet you parrot it all the time.
From where?
The 8 inches per mile squared is from your global setup that you believe in.
The issue is you dismiss all evidence for anything else then cling to this for which you openly admit there is no evidence.
I don't dismiss all evidence for anything else. I look at the evidence and decide if it pertains to fact and I conclude from there what the evidence shows.
The global evidence does not stand up to reality. It simply does not.
What I believe Earth to be is like I always say. It's my theory or musing or whatever people want to think. I do not offer it as fact but plenty of people claim that I do. I can't help with that and it's up to people to decide what they wish. It's not my issue.
It is all an unworkable fantasy and is why you come unstuck on it every time people quiz you for details.
I believe it is workable. What you think of it is irrelevant to me but relevant to you.
You are unfortunately trapped in a paranoid fantasy, which is a shame.
Maybe, maybe not.
I think that can be aimed at anyone who follows a path that offers no provable facts to another path seeker.
The world and beyond is a wonderful place with lots of fascinating things to investigate and learn about, but you sit entirely trapped in your own thoughts making up an alternate reality.
Actually, the Earth may well be much much more than we're told. It may be a paradise away from our physical presence and prying eyes.
Get told it's a ball and you kill off an exploration of the mind for it because we're told it's all mapped and we require passes to visit areas and are forbidden to travel aside from that to other land areas without a pass.
I think there's a lot more to this Earth and many Earths like it.
On the point of experiments, are you willing to give details of method, equipment and results?
Only what you get as I go along and you can basically take from it whatever you want to.
You say "oh people can get simple things and experiment themselves". You ask for extreme detail of experiments, results and calculations from others, yet have only described one single experiment you have done (spirit level in a bath). I can only conclude from that, that your experiments are flawed and you know it, or you lie.
You feel free to decide anything you wish and I'm absolutely ok with it.
Are you willing to give more details as we approach page 700 of you insisting that the rest of humanity is wrong and you have experiments to prove it?
I'll offer what I think is worth offering as and when.
You are not compelled to take part in discussions if this is not acceptable.
Wrong, it is proven reality with overwhelming evidence. The problem is you dismiss it all in your paranoid fantasy. It is not healthy.
I could offer the very same back to you. This goes nowhere to be fair.
I’m particularly impressed that you can see when the multi-million dollar spacecraft hits the dome in this image. All that money for nothing.
A small arc to the drink but told to all that it's going to space.
I can't help people with that. It's up to each individual to see it for what it is or what they're told.
Page 360, myself and
@Kevj Have both showed you quotes where you have said you have done experiments with superfluids.
It's here right in front of you
Must be digging out his years of research......
Getting his spirit level oot
You seem reluctant to point me to the page. Why?
I just don't understand why they scrapped all the technology and can't go back, some say it was to stop the Russians getting their hands on the tech, although to be fair I did see something a few months back that they are working on the technology for a proposed man made landing sometime down the line. Who knows.
