Put a flat earthier into space

[Nobby]

Seem to remember our flat earth friend having to row back on the insistence on personal experiences when he was asked when he had personal experience of the things he claims. From memory it was large bodies of flat unhindered water that dunk him.

He then fell back on this is just what he believes but refused to accept he had a belief system rather than anything of provable substance.

That was shortly before his failed attempt at putting some maths on his ideas

 

[payne]

You're not going to find anything like that in any books. I'm sure you know that.
Imagine finding this out and then wondering why your jewelry is so expensive with so much abundant crystal and what we know as precious metals.
It keeps the people of Earth ticking along.

And neither is your view. It's presented as majority acceptance of it being fact, nothing more than that.

And you know it makes little sense for it to be like we're told.

Logic and you in the same sentence is funny

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Jupiter does what?

You do realise that if you click the arrow beside my name on the quote you questioned, you'd know what.... right?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It really doesn't.
The shape of the Earth had already been known for centuries when Samuel Rowbotham wrote the book you now quote (knowingly or otherwise). That is where the insistance on personal observation comes from along with other bits of flat earther nonsense. He claimed to be a Dr and sold "miracle cures."
What the argument actually boils down to is whether you believe him, or good sense.

No need to rely on anyone but my own research and small but simple experiments and piecingthe theoretical jigsaw, which I do.
Whether that sits well with you or you think it's all absolute utter balderdash, is of no concern to me but I will happily debate with you.

You see why nothing makes sense? Because you clearly dont read the replies.

I read nearly all. The issue for some is when I don't conform to the reply which is not my issue.

No. I'm offering that as one piece of evidence. The proof comes because it's consistent with the many other pieces of evidence discussed on this thread in demonstrating the globe Earth. Not only is it consistent in demonstrating it, it's consistent in demonstrating the scale of it.

It demonstrates another story of many of what's deemed to be a global spinning Earth. It does not demonstrate a truth from your perspective, only adherence to the story and a belief that it is factual enough for you to relay as if it was a fact.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

No need to rely on anyone but my own research and small but simple experiments and piecingthe theoretical jigsaw, which I do.
Whether that sits well with you or you think it's all absolute utter balderdash, is of no concern to me but I will happily debate with you.

and yet your "research" has not led you to Rowbotham?

I read nearly all. The issue for some is when I don't conform to the reply which is not my issue.

Read nearly all, ignore most, deny everything.
It's not a case of conforming to the reply, you asked "Jupiter does what?" when the answer was in the post you quoted. It merely serves to redirect the discussion away from bits you dont care to deal with.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Seem to remember our flat earth friend having to row back on the insistence on personal experiences when he was asked when he had personal experience of the things he claims. From memory it was large bodies of flat unhindered water that dunk him.

He then fell back on this is just what he believes but refused to accept he had a belief system rather than anything of provable substance.

That was shortly before his failed attempt at putting some maths on his ideas

To be fair water kills the spinning globe stone dead but it's boring to keep saying it.
It comes down to whoever wants to actually see past the global ruse and look at alternates.

 

[payne]

Read nearly all, ignore most, deny everything.

The truth is out there

 

[Nobby]

To be fair water kills the spinning globe stone dead but it's boring to keep saying it.
It comes down to whoever wants to actually see past the global ruse and look at alternates.

But you have no direct personal evidence of this that you are able to share

 

[payne]

To be fair water kills the spinning globe stone dead but it's boring to keep saying it.
It comes down to whoever wants to actually see past the global ruse and look at alternates.

It's a pretty shit ruse tbf. I mean who would care if it was a dome?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

and yet your "research" has not led you to Rowbotham?

I've read many things from Rowbotham to the global side.

Read nearly all, ignore most, deny everything.
It's not a case of conforming to the reply, you asked "Jupiter does what?" when the answer was in the post you quoted.

Jupiter does what?

But you have no direct personal evidence of this that you are able to share

A matter of opinion. In your mind I have nothing. In my mind you have nothing. It's just the way it is.

 

[Fats]

I've read many things from Rowbotham to the global side.


Jupiter does what?

A matter of opinion. In your mind I have nothing. In my mind you have nothing. It's just the way it is.

Just take a long, long, long walk.

See where you end up

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's a pretty shit ruse tbf. I mean who would care if it was a dome?

That all depends on what's on offer and what's potentially hidden.

Just take a long, long, long walk.

See where you end up

In the sea.
Where would you end up?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Jupiter does what?

Reads the replies.

 

[fyl2u]

There's no proof.
Bridges work because the calculations are made over land or sea and are set plumb or off centre depending on what is required.
No Earth curvature has to be taken into consideration simply because there is no Earth curvature in terms of a global mindset.
Trust me I'll never change my mind on this.

Let's be straight to the point.
No matter what I offer it's not going to change anything for the majority and I fully understand it.
You can debate what I say or you can call me whatever you think suits you. You get what you get and you do have a choice to overlook it in part or in full.

LIES.
WRONG.
LIES.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.

 

[payne]

That all depends on what's on offer and what's potentially hidden.

What's on offer and what's hidden?

Do they need us to believe it's a ball so we don't look for the massive projector beyond the ice wall?

What would it have to be for basically every discipline of science and mathematics to have been faked forever.

 

[legend7]

They have. Why do you think the mines are so deep?
As for the liquid metal, it's too far down and is the channel for the electrical connection of Earth just as our nerves and capillaries, veins, and blood are the same thing to keep us alive.

It's all about looking past the mainstream stories.

Precious metals are abundant along with gen stones/crystals.
How do I know this? Well, It's not by wearing khaki boots, thick socks and shorts, and a wide-brimmed hat.

They have found abundant gold and crystals, strange why they are rare and precious then.
So on your last point yes, how do you know this?
And to clarify you have zero actual evidence of any of these rivers of gold just thoughts in an empty head?

 

[fyl2u]

They build bridges using calculations for the terrain and climate, not for any global curvature.

WRONG.

I've been shown nothing that you can verify against what you are arguing and for what I'm arguing against..

LIES.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

LIES.
WRONG.
LIES.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.

I love the "Let's be straight to the point." on the 629th page....
It's as good as "Let me explain" - fails to explain
Or "I'll make this simple" - makes up nonsense

 

[fyl2u]

Pinpoint takes out field of view argument.

You're arguing from an orange point of view with cocktail sticks and that argument stands up to the scrutiny of bridges built on that orange.
However, you're using it as your Earth yardstick and you have no facts about Earth supposedly being a globe.

LUNCH DATE.
IDIOCY.
WRONG/LIES/IDIOCY.

It's a simple drop per mile over a horizontal line to the vertical back to the ball/globe, so where does this parabola come into it, and how does that supposedly work on this ball?

MATHEMATICALLY ILLITERATE.

 

[What A Waster]

If you were stood in-between a 50-stone person much taller than you and obviously wider and someone directly behind that 50-stone person was throwing rocks at you and considering we go by your space being the vacuum, then how does the rock thrower manage to hit your body facing the 50 stone person?

Would the 50-stone person take the brunt of the hit with the rest going past and missing you?

Shouldn't Earth's backside be like the moon in this case and should the moon's face be showing those craters?

If me and you were having a snow ball fight and you were stood 1 metre behind a one metre high wall then crouched down i wouldn't be able to hit you. But if i went 40ft up on a cherry picker with a bucket full of snowballs I'd have a good angle to hit easily.

The moon is 240k km away from earth. There's plenty of space to get hit by a meteor. You're only imagining the meteors travelling in one direction