BNM
Striker
I bet she doesn't know the offside rule.
She's not alone in that!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet she doesn't know the offside rule.
They have caved to the feminazisIt's not a position of power. It's the position of power. She received unanimous support from all Premier League clubs at a time when every single one of those Premier League clubs is utterly dependent on revenues continuing to increase to match the rate of their overspending. If you think that football is, first and foremost, a business, then do you really think they engaged in tokenism when appointing someone to the top role? What do the clubs gain from having a female Chief Executive of the league? We know what they lose if she doesn't do a good job.
Not really - a large part of the job is doing the bidding of the big clubs.It's not a position of power. It's the position of power. She received unanimous support from all Premier League clubs at a time when every single one of those Premier League clubs is utterly dependent on revenues continuing to increase to match the rate of their overspending. If you think that football is, first and foremost, a business, then do you really think they engaged in tokenism when appointing someone to the top role? What do the clubs gain from having a female Chief Executive of the league? We know what they lose if she doesn't do a good job.
Maybe, just maybe she is the best person for the job?Not really - a large part of the job is doing the bidding of the big clubs.
And they gain lots of positive free publicity, and it helps deflect from how bad for the domestic game the EPL system is.
Improbable, but not impossible. In a way it is interesting that someone who runs a TV channel is seen as more relevant for the job than someone who works in sport.Maybe, just maybe she is the best person for the job?
Or is that impossible?
Like Platini?Improbable, but not impossible. In a way it is interesting that someone who runs a TV channel is seen as more relevant for the job than someone who works in sport.
Improbable, but not impossible. In a way it is interesting that someone who runs a TV channel is seen as more relevant for the job than someone who works in sport.
Not necessarily football.Like Platini?
I don’t know how relevant commissioning Buffalo mating documentaries will be to managing a football league.Where does pretty much all the league's revenue come from?
I don’t know how relevant commissioning Buffalo mating documentaries will be to managing a football league.
It’s almost as if you’re setting the parameters to prove your pointNot necessarily football.
I don’t know how relevant commissioning Buffalo mating documentaries will be to managing a football league.
Perish the thought!It’s almost as if you’re setting the parameters to prove your point
He was chief exec at the Football League firstProbably not relevant at all, but experience maximising revenues from media and sponsorship rights and developing a digital presence will probably come in handy since it accounts for just about 100% of the league's revenues.
Where do you think Scudamore came from? And how much revenue did the PL generate before and after his tenure?
He was chief exec at the Football League first
Put it this way, if there were three other guys with the same or slightly better qualifications then the positives of having the “first ever woman” and all the attention that goes with it makes her a more desirable candidate from a corporate perspectiveFor 2 years yes, responsible for a league of 72 clubs instead of just 20. And where did he come from before taking the top job at the Football League? Not football.
It seems to me that you are at odds with yourself on this thread. You've already acknowledged that football is a business, yet you don't seem to understand that it is being run as a business...
The Premier League isn't The FA. It isn't a "not-for-profit organisation" tasked with being the guardian of the game in England. It's a corporation with the clubs as its shareholders, and the very reason it came into existence in the first place was to generate as much money as possible for its members. Yet you seem to think that 20 clubs have unanimously been convinced to put their own interests to one side in favour of some hazy concept of "good PR" for having appointed a woman.
Were there 3 other guys? Or was she just the best candidate?Put it this way, if there were three other guys with the same or slightly better qualifications then the positives of having the “first ever woman” and all the attention that goes with it makes her a more desirable candidate from a corporate perspective
This all day, I thought similar with poppy's recentlyanyone else find the outrage about people possibly being outraged about these type of things makes more noise than any actual complaints? strange world
I dunno, but seems unlikely the PL would be short of male candidatesWere there 3 other guys? Or was she just the best candidate?
But she could have been the best? Right?I dunno, but seems unlikely the PL would be short of male candidates
Never said she wasn’t, just that I find that unlikely. She is hardly under qualified, but at the same time there will surely have been similarly qualified male candidates.But she could have been the best? Right?