JonMc
Striker
I haven't dismissed any other aspects. The fact is, they all weren't gangsters etc. But they all were muslims.
Interestingly you get a free pass when suggesting it's the imported nature of gang rape from Pakistan (Aparently there's no proof these men are of Pakistani origin but let's not go into that) but I'm racist for suggesting the religious culture the are from which looks at people and especially women outside the religion as worthless is to blame.
And no politician or public figure would dare raise this because there would be a massive outcry of "islamophobia"
They are all gangsters. They operated rape gangs. That's the definition of gangster and that includes the likes of Amere Singh Dhaliwal, the Leeds ringleader and the Potts family from Coventry. The main fellas from Rotherham were hard nosed drug dealers, used guns as well as being rapists and the Yorkshire Post described them as 'owning Rotherham'. They were gangsters.
The newspaper articles all link the men with mainly Pakistani backgrounds. Rotherham...Newcastle. Faith leaders in Newcastle including those from the islamic faith have all denounced the crimes. Pakistan is a lawless country where street kids are raped with impunity (see the excellent C4 documentary Pakistan's Hidden Shame for details). The rapists in this country must have felt like they were at home away from home.
There is plenty of scope for politicians and public figures who want to implicate Islam in itself as a reason that the grooming exists in this country. They just don't want to be shot down in flames if they do because the evidence isn't there that gang rape is a religious faith problem of any kind. Only you and the other Tommy fanboys are the ones making the religious link for a very good reason.