How? It does no such thing!
It merely gives the ref an opportunity to review an incident. He makes the final call. It’s fine to be anti-VAR, but this incident isn’t a display of its perceived failings.
Poll: so should it have been a penalty?
- Thread starter chunkyshanhawk53
- Start date
How? It does no such thing!
It merely gives the ref an opportunity to review an incident. He makes the final call. It’s fine to be anti-VAR, but this incident isn’t a display of its perceived failings.
No7
Winger
This
Do you understand what a poll is?
Uncle D
Winger
It does.How? It does no such thing!
It merely gives the ref an opportunity to review an incident. He makes the final call. It’s fine to be anti-VAR, but this incident isn’t a display of its perceived failings.
Onlyfoolsrushin
Striker
A completely pointless event, after a decision has been made and executed?
We may as well never discuss anything at all?
safcforever
Striker
Did you watch the Chelsea v Barca match when Drogba went mental?
I’ve never seen anything like it. 2 obviously handballs that the ref just waved away, and booked Drogba after the match for complaining to the camera
Comeback_Kenwyne
Winger
This. I thought it was a penalty. For me, Perisic is jumping weirdly, he is in an odd position - and I think, harsh though it is, that constitutes deliberate handball.
It was a 50-50 call tbh though, so I can see why people would not have it given. What I can't understand is those - particularly one certain wankstain pundit - who were fuming about it, as if it there was no case for the penalty. There was an argument there, surely people can see that?
Did you watch the Chelsea v Barca match when Drogba went mental?
I’ve never seen anything like it. 2 obviously handballs that the ref just waved away, and booked Drogba after the match for complaining to the camera
To this day, I am yet to see a more disgraceful referee performance than that match. Ballack looked like he was going to twat him - I've never seen anything like it either.
No candle for Chelsea whatsoever - but they were robbed, absolutely robbed, in that match.
safcforever
Striker
It was unbelievable. Normally I can reluctantly see it from both sides (after a few days). That Chelsea game made me so f***ing angry and I don’t like Chelsea
MCFC
Winger
Nah, you can´t know if it was intentional or not so to me it´s a pen..
ANonnyMoose
Striker
ARRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHH Thats an OXYMORON!
I'm not a moron.
ANonnyMoose
Striker
BOTH his arms come down and the French player directly in front of him flicks it on.
You do know the law includes the word deliberate tho?
Onto his hand which stopped a goalscoring opportunity. No one's at fault but a pen has to be given and the VAR team and referee all agree.
ANonnyMoose
Striker
You clearly have no clue what the laws of the game are. Go off and have a read then come back.
Yes. I think it's a pen and you don't. Some people (including the match officials) agree with me, some people agree with you. No one's right really, when there's this much debate it's impossible to say either way.
Giz a clue then.
I get that there are differing opinions. But you said it’s not deliberate but a pen. That contradicts the law directly
