Police asking for yet more money in McCann Investigation

Reiver said:
You saying it's a logical conclusion means nothing if you don't have a clue what might have happened.



You've totally missed the point I'm afraid.
Click to expand...
There have been loads of speculation about what could have happened that night. From her getting up and wandering off, the McCanns accidentally giving her an overdose to a burglary gone wrong and loads more.
We don't know. We do know that the parents have an alibi which the police accepted and the police have not charged them with killing her
 


Horatio Pugwash said:
There have been loads of speculation about what could have happened that night. From her getting up and wandering off, the McCanns accidentally giving her an overdose to a burglary gone wrong and loads more.
We don't know. We do know that the parents have an alibi which the police accepted and the police have not charged them with killing her
Click to expand...

Fair enough mate but, ridiculing the proposed scenarios of people, without having any proof to the contrary is how these threads always pan out.

As I said, the popular kidnap/trafficking idea just isn't financially viable.

I'll leave it there .... let's just keep flinging money at it until we prove the Brit cops are better than them useless laidback foreigners ;)
 
Horatio Pugwash said:
I apologise for the nasty
x


Madeleine's mother, who was legally represented in the interview, stayed silent as police threw a series of loaded questions at her that made clear they thought she was involved in her daughter's disappearance.

If her solicitor told her to stay schtum....
Click to expand...
Guilty folks who have something to hide stay schtum or do the "no comment" bollocks. If that was my child I would have answered every question.
 
Reiver said:
I keep asking people what they believe is the most likely scenario and have been ignored .... what do you think?
Click to expand...

It's difficult to answer without knowing everything about the investigation though. There's almost certainly pertinent aspects that won't be made public.
 
look out piano said:
Guilty folks who have something to hide stay schtum or do the "no comment" bollocks. If that was my child I would have answered every question.
Click to expand...

To be fair, people with nothing to hide usually no comment too. It's often lazy or just bad advice from their brief.
 
Horatio Pugwash said:
It depends on the "loaded" questions. There's a reason people take highly qualified solicitors to these interviews
Click to expand...

Ha, yeah, it's usually a retired cop earning a few quid to top up their pensions or a runner just wanting to get to the next job. Hence they just tell the punters to no reply regardless of the circumstances because they really aren't arsed either way. Though in her case, I suspect she took a barrister.
 
gavinmcant said:
To be fair, people with nothing to hide usually no comment too. It's often lazy or just bad advice from their brief.
Click to expand...


what doesn't seem normal to me is the Mccans claimed abduction from the start, not just that the bairn was missing , they were quite certain poor maddie had been abducted by paedophiles ....also Kate originally claimed "they've taken her " who's "they " Kate ? What was she alluding to, she's never been asked to explain her statement
 

Back
Top