chriswallace85
Striker
I took it that you were writing them off as a singles band - they had some great albums.Which singles don't you like?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I took it that you were writing them off as a singles band - they had some great albums.Which singles don't you like?
Far superior to Quo some quality albums.Like Quo they were a great singles band
Regular totps. The twin guitarists looked cool either side too
AyeI took it that you were writing them off as a singles band - they had some great albums.
Not comparing just pointing out they both kept the singles comingFar superior to Quo some quality albums.
Aye, Jazz on the brain...Especially given that it's a Precision.
Lizzy and Quo were different but both released great albums at the same time. The 6 albums from Piledriver to Rockin all over the world were all great albums with quite a hard edge (although that was going on Rockin all over the world). Quo went more pop and got pretty boring after this but they sustained a career 30 odd years longer than Lizzy. I don't say either were better as they were both great - they were different and at the time the best at what they did. The first 3 bands I say were in this order - Lizzy '79, the Jam '79 and Quo '80 - a bit varied but all absolutely great live bands.Aye
It could read that way
Lizzy and Quo etc crossed into people's living rooms through putting an importance on singles
Phil looked every bit the rocker to the pop kids
Not comparing just pointing out they both kept the singles coming
Apparently early Quo is well respected by the rock gang .Not the very early of course
Born under a bad sign?Bit of triv.. Phil was born in Hallam (West Bromwich) hospital exactly one year after Robert Plant was born.. same hospital same ward.
Love Lizzy, not into Quo and don't rate The Jam at all.Lizzy and Quo were different but both released great albums at the same time. The 6 albums from Piledriver to Rockin all over the world were all great albums with quite a hard edge (although that was going on Rockin all over the world). Quo went more pop and got pretty boring after this but they sustained a career 30 odd years longer than Lizzy. I don't say either were better as they were both great - they were different and at the time the best at what they did. The first 3 bands I say were in this order - Lizzy '79, the Jam '79 and Quo '80 - a bit varied but all absolutely great live bands.
Being alive must have helped...Lizzy and Quo were different but both released great albums at the same time. The 6 albums from Piledriver to Rockin all over the world were all great albums with quite a hard edge (although that was going on Rockin all over the world). Quo went more pop and got pretty boring after this but they sustained a career 30 odd years longer than Lizzy. I don't say either were better as they were both great - they were different and at the time the best at what they did. The first 3 bands I say were in this order - Lizzy '79, the Jam '79 and Quo '80 - a bit varied but all absolutely great live bands.
My all time musical hero Philo what s talent he was.
Exactly gone but NEVER forgotten Philo.Make that two.
He had everything, natural song writer, decent base player but above all he was a front Man that could get any crowd going.
His music lives on and never stops getting played here.
Exactly gone but NEVER forgotten Philo.
No what I am suggesting is that Quo have obviously become bland but weren't in the 70's/early '80's. Many band's with shorter careers, for whatever reason, ended without going through a crap period. If the Beatles had not split in 1970 and just had a period away as suggested by George Harrison they may have come back with less inspiring stuff - their image and their credibility could have been tarnished. Most band's get worse with time. for some band's legacies it was, in hindsight, fortunate that they ended when they did - the Sex Pistols or the Beatles probably split at the right time. Thin Lizzy didn't really go through that long term deterioration whereas Quo did.Being alive must have helped...
Fender have just released a Phil Lynott custom shop bass guitar. £11,699 like.
Ah right, I'm with ya - that definitely wasn't clear from your initial post though!No what I am suggesting is that Quo have obviously become bland but weren't in the 70's/early '80's. Many band's with shorter careers, for whatever reason, ended without going through a crap period. If the Beatles had not split in 1970 and just had a period away as suggested by George Harrison they may have come back with less inspiring stuff - their image and their credibility could have been tarnished. Most band's get worse with time. for some band's legacies it was, in hindsight, fortunate that they ended when they did - the Sex Pistols or the Beatles probably split at the right time. Thin Lizzy didn't really go through that long term deterioration whereas Quo did.
Being alive must have helped...
No he stood in between robbo departing and Moore hooking up with them. Or it may have been between moore leaving and robbo rejoining, or moore and robbo buggering off Bit of a revolving door wi them twoI saw Thin Lizzy live about half a dozen times, I know i saw them with Robertson and after he went I saw them with Gary Moore in the band, but I seem to think I also saw them with Midge Ure in the band or is that my memory playing tricks on me
Is that a load of plectrums people have shoved in the strings?Logon or register to see this image