it was obviously meant in a friendly way. But dont let that stop you.Yeah, sure, that's why you told @muggboots to piss off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it was obviously meant in a friendly way. But dont let that stop you.Yeah, sure, that's why you told @muggboots to piss off.
Just pulling your leg, man.it was obviously meant in a friendly way. But dont let that stop you.
OkJust pulling your leg, man.
Only because they didn't have YouTube.the idea that people used to think the earth was flat is actually a modern misconception.
"no educated person in the history of Western Civilisation from the third century BC onward believed that the earth was flat".
The flat earth myth myth - ABC listen
Medieval people thought the world was flat right? Wrong.www.abc.net.au
I'm watching you sonny Jim!Can't get over owld Ted being one like. Spending his well earned retirement watching mental cases spouting shite on you tube.
ThouScroll.Only because they didn't have YouTube.
Sorry, dead people are definitely dead.No they're not. They're suspected. Thats my whole point.
Death certificate - SUSPECTED COVID 19.
Has nobody come up with a decent conspiracy theory yet about why we're so utterly shit at football?
You only understand it because you've been told it works when it clearly would not.Give ower man, he doesn't understand at all and this is why he's talking about the earth rotating at 1,000mph, the laser not even hitting the reflector on the moon and roundabouts.
"I'm simply saying that we are told the earth rotates at over 1000 mph and a laser pointed at a specific thing like a supposed retroreflector would never hit it to come back to source.
It's like sitting on a roundabout and aiming a laser at a person in the playground and expecting it to come right back at you even though your laser aim has missed the person due to your rotation.
It doesn't matter how far it spreads. You're not going to be hitting any retro reflector with a spread laser and have it come back to point of origin.
The earth would move nearly a mile and so would the angle of it's laser beam origin, which has to receive the laser reflection back to that point."
He clearly can't understand that you don't need to be at the same point of origin to see a reflection of a laser beam that has grown bigger due to divergence over a distance. If you have the start point and time and the end point and time then you can work out the distance. I think that's my side of the 'debate' exhausted so will bow out now
Feel free to quote your own quotes.
*Wibbling intensifies*
What I'm saying is, in a debate, people have their own side and all cannot be correct in that argument.By that definition, are you saying that nothing can be proven unless you can do it yourself?
What other way can you verify something if you can't use other sources?
This!Basically something does not fit their personal expectations of the world so conspiracy. When people explain how it works, it is dismissed as bollocks but without any explanation why, often a wacky idea is put in its place without any reasoning and people who have an education and know stuff are branded sheep not thinking for themselves.
This has been demonstrated beautifully, in the discussion about laser range finding, though is missing a mental theory to replace it. Essentially the whole discussion comes down to the understanding (or rather lack of) of the geometry of a cone. This is something really basic that Euclid formalised 2500 years ago.
Note carefully that the specifics have not been dismissed. At no point has divergence of laser beams been dismissed or the maths that over the distance of earth to moon the divergence only has to be tiny. Two basic facts put together to make something very simple possible, but the whole concept has been dismissed as bollocks. If one or the other had been picked up and discussed then it would be a reasoned debate, but this is the joining of the two that seems to be the issue.
You only understand it because you've been told it works when it clearly would not.
Typing "Wayfair" into the Twitter search box today is bringing up some pretty bizarre stuff....
Is this common for furniture companies now? Can you get flat pack Swedish kids from Ikea?Aye apparently they have been dealing in kids rather than furniture. Mental man!
Asking for a friend like mate?Is this common for furniture companies now? Can you get flat pack Swedish kids from Ikea?
What I'm saying is, in a debate, people have their own side and all cannot be correct in that argument.
Unless someone has legitimate proof of something they're getting debated on then that debate simply rumbles on with arguments from each side trying to place reasoning to show evidence of a reality or a denial of it being that.
This is where we're all at with this stuff we're all debating.
People can appeal to authority as much as they want to in their argument but if they cannot verify it then they cannot take the higher pedestal on it.
If you're arguing with me on...say.....a ball in the distance. We can both see a ball shape but neither of us know or can move to that distance.
You say it's a football and I say it's a tennis ball.
As it stands we are neither right or wrong but are debating it, using all available arguments.
If a group of journalists pulled up beside us and said it was a football because they've been told by some scientists who went that far and saw it.
Then you can claim victory in your debate with me base of nothing more than your adherence to the words from that group.
If I could walk that distance to verify it for myself then I would know. You would feel no need to as your guess is backed by the masses against my lone self.
And this is basically how all this stuff goes.
Sounds quasi cultish to me. Blind faith without evidence and often despite evidence.Bless man
You've found an angle that lets you dismiss phenomena that exceed your intellectual capacity, without having to engage in debate and go through having each and every point objectively taken apart. No matter how wrong you are, you can't be wrong, because you don't believe it
I'm more than happy to be wrong if someone can prove what I'm arguing against, is correct.Bless man
You've found an angle that lets you dismiss phenomena that exceed your intellectual capacity, without having to engage in debate and go through having each and every point objectively taken apart. No matter how wrong you are, you can't be wrong, because you don't believe it
Most adherence of the masses to hypothetical science, is blind faith.Sounds quasi cultish to me. Blind faith without evidence and often despite evidence.
We could do a little test. We could go to the top of a high building. I will push you off. Science states, because of gravity you will plummet to your death. But with your mindset, you probably believe gravity is a hoax. A blind faith. A hypothetical science. Not to be trusted. In the name of science, im willing to test it and risk being proven wrong. If you’re right and I’m wrong and you survive, I will bestow upon you all my worldly possessions. Sound fair?I'm more than happy to be wrong if someone can prove what I'm arguing against, is correct.
Appealing to authority by someone who does not hold any facts, does not make something a truth.
Most adherence of the masses to hypothetical science, is blind faith.