mackem1989
Striker
Bobs a genuine sound bloke like, he does get carried away at times on here but I do believe the info he is given is from a source in the club if it’s wrong it’s on them giving him dud info.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup.Bobs a genuine sound bloke like, he does get carried away at times on here but I do believe the info he is given is from a source in the club if it’s wrong it’s on them giving him dud info.
It's just methven using the crypto gang to try raise the price up
Is that right, isn't it Bob Edwards or is that twitter and I've got wrong end of the sti
Are you irish?Don’t follow him with your shite craic
Who’s said it’s not?I’m still struggling to get my head around KLD expecting someone to spend decent money on shares to have no control at all. I thought it was a shoe in that it would be a family member.
They'd still have a say. Loads of people have less than majority shares in football clubs. It's investing in something you think can do well.I’m still struggling to get my head around KLD expecting someone to spend decent money on shares to have no control at all. I thought it was a shoe in that it would be a family member.
Maybe he doesn’t expect anyone to …. Maybe that’s his strategy of squeezing the charlatans out, as nobody is going to buy a stake in the club without having any control.I’m still struggling to get my head around KLD expecting someone to spend decent money on shares to have no control at all. I thought it was a shoe in that it would be a family member.
So why don’t you say the same about the others who are “ITK”?Bobs a genuine sound bloke like, he does get carried away at times on here but I do believe the info he is given is from a source in the club if it’s wrong it’s on them giving him dud info.
Nobody reputable will. But chancers and two bit con artists will because it’ll be their opportunity to own a football club.Maybe he doesn’t expect anyone to …. Maybe that’s his strategy of squeezing the charlatans out, as nobody is going to buy a stake in the club without having any control.
They can't afford to buy a stake, that's the whole point. They've got no money whatsoever.I can’t buy this, surely any one that can afford to buy a significant stake in a championship club and all that goes with that would be able to see right through someone like Methven?
I know Bob and I know @deodrant2 and I’ve had info off them proven to be correct, I can’t comment on the others as I do not know them off the board.So why don’t you say the same about the others who are “ITK”?
Currently Bobs source,on this new shareholder stuff is not someone within the clubBobs a genuine sound bloke like, he does get carried away at times on here but I do believe the info he is given is from a source in the club if it’s wrong it’s on them giving him dud info.
I’m still struggling to get my head around KLD expecting someone to spend decent money on shares to have no control at all. I thought it was a shoe in that it would be a family member.
...you cant be that much of a mate...he went to 606 couple days ago.Bob has now either been banned or deleted his account,yes gone from here.
Migrated to where has yet to be confirmed
Its like any inverstment. Look at club on the rise, buy the shares at a reasonable price and in a few years time they are worth far more. There will be a lot of potential investors looking at getting involved in clubs. Sunderland's advantage is that it has reduced its cost base, is probably quite cheap and, as witnessed at Wembley, has massive potential. Not every investor wants to be the decision maker. That is why that crypto nonsense would be so disappointing. They want to turn an incredibly quick profit with zero interest in what happens after that.I’m still struggling to get my head around KLD expecting someone to spend decent money on shares to have no control at all. I thought it was a shoe in that it would be a family member.