partridge amongst the pig
Striker
I think he'll be our first choice right back when he gets fit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hugshy ?Didn’t know he was Dutch.
YeshHugshy ?
Huggins is class, just hope he can avoid injury’s
He will be starting every game once fit enough.
I like Gooch but he is not a defender. Whereas Higgins is firstly a defender.Considering he's never played a full season of league football yet the sensible thing would be to avoid burning him out,like we did with Cirkin,Doyle and Neil.
It may be if he has a good pre -season we dont buy a right back and rotate him with Onien (who I think would be better than Gooch at this level).
Who knows
I’m not even sure it is a bad injury as such, just one that takes a long time to heal and requires careful rehab. I know that might sound contradictory but in terms of prognosis there are worse injuries.Really think hes going to be a goodun like.
Yes that was a bad injury but just hope he gets totally over it.
Longer he is injured the better he gets.
Soon to attain legend status,it's the way on here.Ha!
That’s a good one that like, love it
Played 3 games in his career so far.I think he'll be our first choice right back when he gets fit.
I’m not even sure it is a bad injury as such, just one that takes a long time to heal and requires careful rehab. I know that might sound contradictory but in terms of prognosis there are worse injuries.
Stress fracture somewhere in his back I thinkwhat even was his injury ??
OI OI OIHuggy, Huggy, Huggy ........
If Huggins represents such a risk to SAFC, because he can’t be relied upon to be available and fit because of an injury, why would another club want to take the risk of factoring him into their plans for the season ?I think the lad could do with playing regular and getting some senior football under his belt.
He's barely played 10 senior games and he's 22 I believe
Possibly loan move I'd say
The lad needs to play football next season. If that's with us and he played 40+ games, idealIf Huggins represents such a risk to SAFC, because he can’t be relied upon to be available and fit because of an injury, why would another club want to take the risk of factoring him into their plans for the season ?
I accept that you are not one of the ‘injury prone’ contingent. Nor am I. However, what we can accept as a fact is that Huggins has, most recently, had a quite serious, season-ending back injury.The lad needs to play football next season. If that's with us and he played 40+ games, ideal
If he isn't going to play that many games for us then the best thing for him and us would be to go out on loan and get that experience.
The lad needs to play games for the good on his career.
I've mentioned nothing about a risk / injury
I guess clubs have to weight up that option and obviously there are medicals which take place etc... to establish the fitness / future fitness of the playerI accept that you are not one of the ‘injury prone’ contingent. Nor am I. However, what we can accept as a fact is that Huggins has, most recently, had a quite serious, season-ending back injury.
So my question remains sound.
Why would another club want to factor Huggins into their plans for the forthcoming season, when SAFC isn’t prepared to do so ?
So Huggins, if proven fit (which he’d have to be to get a loan move), is good enough for alternative clubs to take a gamble with, but not for Sunderland, because … errr … he might not be reliable enough ?I guess clubs have to weight up that option and obviously there are medicals which take place etc... to establish the fitness / future fitness of the player
The lad is a talented player and I have no doubt there would be plenty suitors for him, whether that's in L1 or even L2.
He definitely needs to play though that can't be denied