So if he has to go cap in hand to the bank, that effectively puts them in charge?
The club owes them £68M so we have to "work" with them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if he has to go cap in hand to the bank, that effectively puts them in charge?
I think everyone of us knows that it's not pretty. However I think there's a possibility that the club is even more fucked than we actually think.The club owes them £68M so we have to "work" with them.
So if he has to go cap in hand to the bank, that effectively puts them in charge?
Surely relegation means a reduction in turn over though?
I think everyone of us knows that it's not pretty. However I think there's a possibility that the club is even more fucked than we actually think.
So if he has to go cap in hand to the bank, that effectively puts them in charge?
Surely relegation means a reduction in turn over though?
You seen this.... win percentage worse, than both of the most hated managers in our history found it on twitter
Logon or register to see this image
Diabolical mate. I cannot believe he still hasn't gone the distance.
Can you see the owner paying for him to walk...... ?
I can't see Grayson continuing either way. Tuesday seems to be make or break but considering he should have been given the boot after the Sheff Utd game, why wait? Even if we miraculously beat Bolton, why allow him to continue? He should have walked by now imo, accepting that his methods weren't working. He ran out of ideas a long time ago, he argued that it was unfair as many of his players were unavailable, wll now they are and nothing's changed.
Why's Mcmanaman not getting a look in after a solid start? He has to rely on sub appearances.
He is shite but not as shit as this clownAlex McLeish... just wait![]()
I can't see Grayson continuing either way. Tuesday seems to be make or break but considering he should have been given the boot after the Sheff Utd game, why wait? Even if we miraculously beat Bolton, why allow him to continue? He should have walked by now imo, accepting that his methods weren't working. He ran out of ideas a long time ago, he argued that it was unfair as many of his players were unavailable, wll now they are and nothing's changed.
Why's Mcmanaman not getting much of a look in after a solid start? He has to rely on sub appearances.
He is shite but not as shit as this clown
Once it gets to the point whereby it's a case of saying "lose this game and you're sacked" then you're just postponing the inevitable. What if he wins the next one but loses the next 3? It's ridiculous.
It's not very often a manager is sacked after a win, is it?Once it gets to the point whereby it's a case of saying "lose this game and you're sacked" then you're just postponing the inevitable. What if he wins the next one but loses the next 3? It's ridiculous.
It's not very often a manager is sacked after a win, is it?
I think it's saying we can pay the bills but only if we stick to the agreed cashflow forecast, thus enabling SBC to get whatever interest and or capital as and when it's due. They are owed £68M though and interest is something like 9%. Maybe Short has renegotiated the repayment terms on condition the club involve SBC in the financial decision making process.
It's also a possibility that it makes financial sense for the club to be relegated.