Be Here Now
Striker
Set to be confirmed by next week according to The Times
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Set to be confirmed by next week according to The Times
Right, I’m back to wanting those robbing pricks to be hounded out of the club. f***ing disgraceful that they’ve got that much money for almost destroying this club.£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?
£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?
How the f**k have they managed that. 30 mil for half the club and the loan paid off. The one the lying bastard said he didnt need, that loan.£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?
Was going so at least Dick Turpin wore a mask. But we’re all wearing f***ing masks these days. Robbed the kid and have hung around to watch him. At least muggers run away.£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?
How the f**k have they managed that. 30 mil for half the club and the loan paid off. The one the lying bastard said he didnt need, that loan.
What did he pay in the end? £12m at the beginning and rumoured to have put in a bit more? Wrecked us completely sold just about everything he could get away with and will double his money. Absolute arseholeRight, I’m back to wanting those robbing pricks to be hounded out of the club. f***ing disgraceful that they’ve got that much money for almost destroying this club.
Anywhere I can read the article without a Times subscription?
And am I reading it that he has paid £30M to Donald minus £11M to the Yanks, or £30M to Donald plus £11M to the Yanks? I presume the former rather than the latter?
Or he’s got more coin than sense and he’s been blagged. I really hope you are right mate.The only reason he would of paid that price is because he can see the potential we have and must have some serious money involved.
Or he isnt much of a businessmanThe only reason he would of paid that price is because he can see the potential we have and must have some serious money involved.
First reply to that tweet suggests he's paid 59% of the £30m valuation of the club, not £30m for 59%.
Saying that, I can't get into the article behind the paywall.
Makes you wonder what this Hedge Fund kidda who says that he going to sue everyone was offering. He claims that it was substantially more than anyone else but of course the Club says that he never provided any satisfactory poof of funds. This seems credible because the offer must have been well over the top and on that basis its unlikely to have been turned down if the money could have been shown to be there.£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?
Very dubious about the accuracy of that number.£30m for 59%?.
How have they got that much out of him!?