Vauxie
Striker
AyeRehab
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AyeRehab
Wonder how Ipswich are fairing with FFP they seem to sign loadsC
Chris Weatherspoon's analysis was no more than speculation. Grumpy had an analysis which suggested we are closer to the limits of FFP. I guess you decide who's speculative analysis you choose to believe. However, to suggest that FFP doesn't affect every club's spending plans is firmly putting your head in the sand. As has been said many times clubs with parachute payments or clubs who have sold players for big fees will always be the big spenders in the EFL rather than the richest owners. Our crowds will help, but only to a limited extent.
We should've just signed Keinan Davis imo, 1m, sorted.The longer it goes on, the more likely we' could panic and just get anyone in. That said, there could be bargains to be had near the end when teams realise they don't want players around who won't play.
I'm mindful of the word agenda as it has connotations. But there's no doubt that his articles serve his viewpoint. Otherwise he wouldn't be including headline grabbing statements like 'SAFC could lose £30m+ in 22/23 without breaching FFP' which is able to rev up the fanbase as it is completely shorn of context and any semblance of sensible governance. We could do that, of course, but we'd then be placing ourselves squarely in the crosshairs of the EFL if we failed - as that sort of behaviour would inevitably lead to a firesale in 23/24 if we missed out on promotion.
Maybe they think it's 4UK FAIR PLAY !Wonder how Ipswich are fairing with FFP they seem to sign loads
I would believe ChrisC
Chris Weatherspoon's analysis was no more than speculation. Grumpy had an analysis which suggested we are closer to the limits of FFP. I guess you decide who's speculative analysis you choose to believe. However, to suggest that FFP doesn't affect every club's spending plans is firmly putting your head in the sand. As has been said many times clubs with parachute payments or clubs who have sold players for big fees will always be the big spenders in the EFL rather than the richest owners. Our crowds will help, but only to a limited extent.
Aye a 15 in 120 games striker would gone down a treat on hereWe should've just signed Keinan Davis imo, 1m, sorted.
Aye a 15 in 120 games striker would gone down a treat on here
Haven't a clue palis the jay one dead?![]()
Is he still at Villa?We should've just signed Keinan Davis imo, 1m, sorted.
Wonder how Ipswich are fairing with FFP they seem to sign loads
As long as its not Keith LardFrank Burnside and Don Beech will take care of Sally im sure
Is he still at Villa?
Scored 7 in 34 last season and 5 in 15 before that.Aye a 15 in 120 games striker would gone down a treat on here
Prefab?
They will be well aware of what their expenditure is compared to the FFP restrictions. There are many clubs now who have been docked points and relegated due to FFP rules such as Reading and Derby. To say that suggesting that FFP doesn't guide spending plans is a false narrative is, itself, false. I am now expert but people are saying that FFP demands 3 year plans or that it is judged over a three year period. Sunderland, like, no doubt, Ipswich will have projections of revenue for the next three years and a three year plan for transfer and wage spending.Wonder how Ipswich are fairing with FFP they seem to sign loads
You can do but he fully acknowledges that he is speculating and, hence, making assumptions that may be wide of the mark. Re-read his analysis and you will see he acknowledges the assumptions he is making and that they may be incorrect. Its just a guess based on limited information.I would believe Chris
Rolling back the yearsThe chalked outline of a dead man