MotM vs Tranmere


Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you still believe he has a promising top flight career ahead of him?

No I don't, he will be long gone by the time we get back there and due to his injury problems ,it's too late for him .
I do however believe he's not shite and if he stays injury free ,he will contribute positively in a promotion campaign.
As usual you did not answer my question .
Is he shite or not?
 
Bless yer, going down the name calling route.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: The irony. :rolleyes:
No I don't, he will be long gone by the time we get back there and due to his injury problems ,it's too late for him .
I do however believe he's not shite and if he stays injury free ,he will contribute positively in a promotion campaign.
As usual you did not answer my question .
Is he shite or not?
Well he's not very good. He had a good game the other night for the first time in a long time. Whether or not he can replicate that performance and how often remains to be seen, but given his record I certainly wouldn't want to be relying on him too much.
 
Last edited:
:lol: The irony. :rolleyes:

Well he's not very good. He had a good game the other night for the first time in a long time. Whether or not he can replicate that performance and how often remains to be seen, but given his record I certainly wouldn't want to be relying on him too much.
I think Watmore is a really good player for this level. His one and only problem is his perpetual injuries.
 
Where did I go down the name calling route? I said it was pathetic that your agenda with Watmore should stop you putting him in the top 3 performers on the night, which I still stick by.
:lol: You've just acknowledged it yourself man, saying I'm pathetic and telling me to grow up for having a different opinion of the game to you. If I'd come on here saying Watmore's shite, he scuffed his shot, keeper shoulda done better, dived for the freekick and got lucky with the cross you might have had a point, but that wasn't the case.
I think Watmore is a really good player for this level. His one and only problem is his perpetual injuries.
He may well be - let's face it, the competition's pretty slim. His passing needs to improve as does his decision making - the latter comes with brains which some one here seem to think he has in abundance - but him getting behind defenders and actually putting the ball across the box looks a decent start.
 
Last edited:
:lol: The irony. :rolleyes:

Well he's not very good. He had a good game the other night for the first time in a long time. Whether or not he can replicate that performance and how often remains to be seen, but given his record I certainly wouldn't want to be relying on him too much.
So you don't think he is shite ?
Bit confused as on another post yesterday ,you gave a like to someone who said "Watmore is shite " .
Now you are saying he had a good game yesterday ,hard to believe if he is in fact shite ,don't you agree .
 
So you don't think he is shite ?
Bit confused as on another post yesterday ,you gave a like to someone who said "Watmore is shite " .
Now you are saying he had a good game yesterday ,hard to believe if he is in fact shite ,don't you agree .
It amused me. IF you're that interested in my other posts besides this thread, you might notice I expressed concerns about Maguire's attitude yesterday as well, despite me thinking he was man of the match on Tuesday night. I've raised my concern about the fullbacks time and again on here over the past few months, which is why in part I felt Hume's performance deserved a mention - and if ya really that bothered about all the things I say I even turned to my mate whilst at the match and said something along the lines of "this is the best game Hume's had for us tonight." I'm still not 100% convinced he is the answer though.

And besides, even shit players can have a good game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top