Bluepaul
Central Defender
The force was possibly - and probably - entirely reasonable.
Could be, not in my opinion.
Glad we've cleared up the whole 'guideline' issue up, took a while but we got there.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The force was possibly - and probably - entirely reasonable.
I think its because you cantReasonable force to make an arrest, I honestly can't believe I'm having to explain this.
Cleared up you havent the faintest idea of what you are talking aboutGlad we've cleared up the whole 'guideline' issue up, took a while but we got there.
I think its because you cant
I think its because you cant
Cleared up you havent the faintest idea of what you are talking about
You are right it isnt hard to work out yet you havent managed it yetSee above, it's really not hard to work out mate.
The Police have powers to use reasonable force to make an arrest, that's the f***ing guideline.
Ah right, I thought it was reported he was 17, sorry.
Not read the thread but I'll bet there will be two opinions.. 1 from the people over 35 who grew up with discipline saying "well done police" and those under 35 who grew up not knowing real discipline, screaming police brutality.
I'm in the former group.. do as you are told.. dont get a smack. Simple.
You were asked for any legislation, policy or guidance that states someone in cuffs can’t be struck with a baton.Glad we've cleared up the whole 'guideline' issue up, took a while but we got there.
You were asked for any legislation, policy or guidance that states someone in cuffs can’t be struck with a baton.
It doesn't exist.
There's nothing to clear up - you're just typing for the sake of it, having avoided the question posed to you.
See above, it's really not hard to work out mate.
The Police have powers to use reasonable force to make an arrest, that's the f***ing guideline.
Ok pal, have a good day.
It’s not a guideline it is legislation At the risk of sounding all Ted Hastings it is covered by section 117 of PACE, section 3 of the criminal law act and also common law. None of those say a person in handcuffs cannot have force used on them be that by baton, taser, CS or any open hand technique.
My question, which you still have not answered, was can you show me anything which says that someone in handcuffs cannot be given a baton strike? I bet you can’t.
It’s not a guideline it is legislation At the risk of sounding all Ted Hastings it is covered by section 117 of PACE, section 3 of the criminal law act and also common law. None of those say a person in handcuffs cannot have force used on them be that by baton, taser, CS or any open hand technique.
My question, which you still have not answered, was can you show me anything which says that someone in handcuffs cannot be given a baton strike? I bet you can’t.
Ok if they're stacked (I think that's what you cal it - arms pointing in different directions horizontally ???)Only issue for me from the video is that it's never ideal to handcuff someone to the front.
Other than that, the lad isn't complying and is an unknown risk - justified use of force.
Ok if they're stacked (I think that's what you cal it - arms pointing in different directions horizontally ???)
It's not ideal how these are on, but at least they're on.
Everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law marra.Was the lad guilty of anything?