I hadn't seen anything in the press recently.I thought the topic was worth a return given the stories about the McCanns and Amaral in the press recently.
As for the DNA, my point is that the DNA available matched Maddie, unfortunately it was highly degraded, from bleach I'd imagine. The point is it could have ruled out Maddie and it didnt.
You continuing to try to make a point demonstrates that you haven't the first clue about the use of DNA as a forensic tool.
Not that I'm an expert but compared to you I'm Francis Crick.