Have a watchThat is a pic.. not a
Pizzagate.. end of f***ing story.. goodnight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have a watchThat is a pic.. not a
Pizzagate.. end of f***ing story.. goodnight
Punishable by contempt of court.
Have they made a statement which has been the subject of a court proceeding?Punishable by contempt of court.
I know that silly, my post was regarding Bobs quote that Changing statements is not evidence. It is.It never went to court
No they haven't as everyone knows this case hasn't reached the court.Have they made a statement which has been the subject of a court proceeding?
Do you think the rest of the group were/are in on it?
No, too many people, and with all the newspaper interest over the years, I am sure someone would have cracked of fallen foul of check book journalism.Do you think the rest of the group were/are in on it?
The action of changing a statement is not in itself evidence of a crime.I know that silly, my post was regarding Bobs quote that Changing statements is not evidence. It is.
No they haven't as everyone knows this case hasn't reached the court.
Did he say it was?The action of changing a statement is not in itself evidence of a crime.
Difficult one mate. Personally I don't think they know the full extent and probably got told the same as the rest of us. The parents could have asked them not to make them look bad in regards to leaving the children. Making them come up wuth that cock and bull story about chechking on kids. Also pressurising them with guilt about losing the twins and telling them that they did the same (leave bairns unattended) so they'd be in trouble too.
Yep.Did he say it was?
I didn't though marra, I said that there is strong evidence of them lying - I didn't say anything about them committing a crime other than they have changed their statements, you disputed that changing the statements isn't in any way evidence when it clearly is.Yep.
Apparently not.Yep.
You said that them changing their statement was evidence they killed Maddie.I didn't though marra, I said that there is strong evidence of them lying - I didn't say anything about them committing a crime other than they have changed their statements, you disputed that changing the statements isn't in any way evidence when it clearly is.
give owaYou said that them changing their statement was evidence they killed Maddie.
I didn't though marra, I said that there is strong evidence of them lying - I didn't say anything about them committing a crime other than they have changed their statements, you disputed that changing the statements isn't in any way evidence when it clearly is.
I'll refer you to this post.I'm lost here.
Ignoring for a second that reporting accuracy of this case went out the window a long time ago, if the McCanns did change their statement, what is this actually evidence of?
That cant be ruled out, have you not seen Man on Fire.The police lied to the press about having conclusive DNA evidence. Therefore the police must have done it.
Remember Robbied was saying that changing their Statement/ lying was evidence they killed Maddie.give owa
Changing statements is evidence of absolutely nothing man. You are talking absolute rubbish here.I'll refer you to this post.
McCann Doc coming to Netflix
I was just sticking up for robbied1 as epping rubbished his reply, in fact there was some evidence and I was just trying to point that out in the interests of a balanced debate based on evidence.
That cant be ruled out, have you not seen Man on Fire.