FootballFan
Striker
Might want to see the later episodes then.
Amaral is pretty clear what happened in the book, its all on record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Might want to see the later episodes then.
Amaral is pretty clear what happened in the book, its all on record.
Ehem ---> He is not the McCanns!![]()
I wonder what possessed him to lie on tv then.Amaral is pretty clear what happened in the book, its all on record.
Yep. Not a real detective but one written to enthral the Victorian public. Nice analogy.
And these charges of yours are also fictional, not fact. Unless that that body turns up that was disposed of on a whim. in a hurry, under immense pressure and in the glare of a missing child investigation.
So you're now suggesting what I said wasn't libellous because he wouldn't sue?
I wonder what possessed him to lie on tv then.
I wonder what possessed him to lie on tv then.
I have, you're speculating for speculation sake.
There is no evidence and nothing to see here and nothing to charge them with.
Its all based on that people don't seem to like them.
Eh? He was sacked![]()
You'd think someone with such training in evidence gathering would see this to be very much primary
I am suggesting it was libellous, it was you brought up the fact Amaral is not litigious.
I would imagine he has not and you are confusing things. Just a wild guess.
Have;you been drinking? Your words:
"Did he sue? NO"
"Because he's not the McCanns"
Watch the show, prove me wrong rather than "a wild guess".
So you are sticking by your guns?
I see now one side gets protection and the other not.
As I said, I'm happy for anyone to charge me with libel over anything I've stated which has been stated many times in the British mainstream media and also by the man himself on a documentary on Netflix (which is what this whole thread is about, you know?)
What did he say on Netflix - Panther has already said it was a translation.
The facts are very clear, and you have instead sought to libel a good man who you blatantly know nothing about, not even his name.
Prove my libel.
He stated that he was sacked on a Global streaming provider.
Then why does he say he was sacked in the Netflix documentary?
Also you stated he is a "good man". Where is your proof of this?
I would say that he doesnt, quite confidently in fact.