Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having watched this series the major thing thing for me is the mum never sheds a tear even when she is pulling these anguished faces at the press conferences and the father well what a control freak he comes across as he makes your skin crawl a proper arrogant fcuker, the same as his PR team and the woman and priest , god the lot of them are something else there’s something sinister about them , the northern Irish fella in the child protection agency couldn’t stand him and his job is to show as much empathy as possible to these families ,
whatever the side you take on this something isn’t right , someone or a lot of people are covering a lot of Sh1t up
Personally don't think there is anything sinister about them. Not sure how any person would react if they had been accused of killing their own child. Maybe they realised the best chance of finding her was to remain focused and that has come across as cold to some people.
The powers that be are already removing incriminating evidence from this thread out of fear of being sued by the Mur.... I mean McCann's.
There's nothing dodgy about this at all..
I think releasing an e-fit of a critical suspect might have helped.
I just checked mine to see if this was legit and it recommends a film called “One bad choice”Hang on...
Logon or register to see this image
Oh it gets worse...
Logon or register to see this image
I just checked mine to see if this was legit and it recommends a film called “One bad choice”![]()
It does seem like a strange decision. Still don't believe they had any involvement at all mind.
Then why actively prevent evidence which would help find Maddie?
How did they? it turned out to be a random tourist.
It was deemed the critical new evidence that could help find Maddie in the Crime-Watch appeal.
So I repeat, why did they block its release?
your logic doesn't make sense
it had nothing to do with the crime
so your logic that they would try and block it makes no sense
also the description that Jane Tanner gave turned out to be exactly like it.
Are you saying the McCanns are time travellers now?
The Met deemed it a break in the case ffs.
How can you not get my point?
If they'd have done it, then they knew that that evidence had nothing to do with the case
Why the fuck would they then suppress it, if they were guilty they'd have done the exact opposite and made a big deal of it.
ffs