Man Utd v Jose Mourinho's Tottenham

[zebediah]

Good play by Alli, but Fred's attempt to defend was laughable.

 

[myleftfoot1978]

Is it just my telly and bb that is causing all this buffering, keeps playing for a few mins then goes off, trying 1 more time then I’m off to watch king author on Netflix if it goes off again

 

[S.S.R..]

Clear and Obvious has been abandoned and they're resorting to putting under a magnifying glass to see if a forearm hair or thread off a sleeve touched the ball.

 

[Ashley In!!]

This place deemed Alli shite not long ago

Because he was playing shite.

 

[Vicham]

I thought the way he protected the ball away from Fred is really what made that goal. The touch is excellent, no doubt, but he would never have had the chance to make the touch had he not been able to keep Fred behind him

 

[myleftfoot1978]

And that’s me finished with this game for the night

 

[gazc24]

Man United need half time honestly can not pass, that goals completely changed the game

 

[zebediah]

I thought the way he protected the ball away from Fred is really what made that goal. The touch is excellent, no doubt, but he would never have had the chance to make the touch had he not been able to keep Fred behind him

Fred actually goes the wrong side of him, amateurish.

 

[Vicham]

Clear and Obvious has been abandoned and they're resorting to putting under a magnifying glass to see if a forearm hair or thread off a sleeve touched the ball.

Magnifying glass is what people demand, justice by the millimeter, not judgement by the referee. Absolute bullshit, VAR

 

[S.S.R..]

Imagine they did a VAR and it just cut to a camera outside double-checking it said Anfield on the gates

 

[Jack Torrance]

Because he was playing shite.

Players go through bad form

 

[x ALiEN 8]

Pretty sure it was around just over a year Poch’s Spurs battered Jose’s United 1-3 at Old Trafford? Football is a funny old game.

0-3

 

[Rick O Shea]

Should’ve been ruled out under the current rules. Looks as if it just touched his arm and that’s enough.

So how come Liverpool's first goal against Man City was allowed to stand?

 

[hank williams]

2-1 united

I couldn't tip a snooker que

 

[SAFC 83]

So how come Liverpool's first goal against Man City was allowed to stand?

Don't know mate, I can't recall seeing it but by the daft rules we're going by, it has to be ruled out. Having VAR look at it and then to let it stand is even more bizarre to me, unless they have softened their approach towards the interpretation and are going to let goals stand if it's not immediately obvious whether it's touched the attacking players arm or not.

Don't get me wrong I think having one rule for defenders and a different one for attackers is daft and that was a good goal to my mind but imo it touched his arm.