SAFC Wilks
Striker
So Chelsea beat Man C 1-0...big whoop, we do that all the time

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One shot on target in the second half, wasn't it? Two in total?All this 'outwitted' 'out thought' is a load of bollocks really. Its hardly like Man City never created nowt. They could have quite easily scored another 4 tonight if they had there shooting boots on
City are beatable. They're shaky when teams have a go at them (see: Blackburn, Cardiff, Watford). We can do it.
Eh? If anyone should have scored more it was Chelsea. They were superb.
One shot on target in the second half, wasn't it? Two in total?
I am not saying Chelsea shouldnt have scored more. It was two very good teams who both created chances, Chelsea took one of there's, Man City never.
I just think people look to deep into things sometimes with this 'Outwitted' 'Came with a plan' etc etc stuff
Jovetic should have came on for navas not negredo. And how demichelis played the whole game is beyond me.
The thing with city though is they usually play through the centre with nasri and silva behind. Navas doesnt fit there normal formation, they dont play natural wingers. Plus most his crosses were straight into a defenderand who would have supplied the crosses?
You're looking too much at the scoreline, which suggests a close game.
It wasn't. Chelsea dominated.
The thing with city though is they usually play through the centre with nasri and silva behind. Navas doesnt fit there normal formation, they dont play natural wingers. Plus most his crosses were straight into a defender
It wasnt like they never created any chances was it?[DOUBLEPOST=1391464653][/DOUBLEPOST]
Difference in personal between Chelsea and Sunderland could make that rather tricky![]()