dickie mc rich
Winger
just finished the lot in two days, It's shocking, I simply share his lawyers view that I hope he did do it, as serving this amount of unjust time twice is unfathomable and sickening
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just finished the lot in two days, It's shocking, I simply share his lawyers view that I hope he did do it, as serving this amount of unjust time twice is unfathomable and sickening
Could read his face like a book. That was enough for me to know he found the vehicle right then. Also did you see he was the one leading dassey to the court for his trail. He look like he was desperately trying to hold back smiles. How was he allowed to do this?Too many inconsistences isn't there....but still not 100% sure myself tbh.
Spoiler potentially..
But what about his face when he rang the car plate in and stated thee year? For me, that told me a story..
I think it was wishful thinking on his part as he had so much emotion in his voice and was upset (genuinely questioning his faith in the legal system). I'm actually not sure wether he did do it or not. But I'm 100% the sheriffs manipulated the dassey confession and 100% sure they planted, moved or interfered with the evidence to further incriminate Steven! Meaning dassey is completely innocent and Stevens case should've been thrown out.Do you not think that was significant thst he did say that? These fellas would hsve spent more time with him than anybody and for him to say thst made me think he believes he has done it
They were excellent, which is part of the heart ache with the verdict. Think Steven not taking the stand always going to look bad to a jury.Not questioning the defence lawyers at all. They couldn't have done much more. Have you watched the show?
Do you not think that was significant thst he did say that? These fellas would hsve spent more time with him than anybody and for him to say thst made me think he believes he has done it
Dean Strang has publicly stated he isn't convinced of Avery's innocence. But he's also not convinced of his guilt.Do you not think that was significant thst he did say that? These fellas would hsve spent more time with him than anybody and for him to say thst made me think he believes he has done it
I thought this like. There's no accounting for grief and the desire to hold somebody to task which I can understand, but the whole american media circus around it all made me feel uneasy. It can't be ethical to be able to stand in front of the nations press and proclaim a mans guilt repeatedly, and with such unswerving conviction halfway through a trial where he is allegedly inocent until proven otherwise.I Don't like Mike Halbach at all, theres something about him that makes me cringe, his constant praising of the police department, his smug grins to the camera in court and his eagerness to get in front of the cameras, definite wrong un
The whole "murder is hot" comment summed that up.I thought this like. There's no accounting for grief and the desire to hold somebody to task which I can understand, but the whole american media circus around it all made me feel uneasy. It can't be ethical to be able to stand in front of the nations press and proclaim a mans guilt repeatedly, and with such unswerving conviction halfway through a trial where he is allegedly inocent until proven otherwise.
I've just finished episode 4. How the hell can those two special investigators, Dassey's lawyer and his investigator live with themselves? The interviews and manipulation of that mentally challenged young lad was one of the most disgusting things I have seen.
And, for that matter, how can a judge watch it and say he sees no evidence of manipulation?
Stop stating your opinion as fact mate. You know as much as anyone on this thread.No they don't think he did it all, they are just making a poignant point.
Haway man
Interesting development there @johnsonDean Strang has publicly stated he isn't convinced of Avery's innocence. But he's also not convinced of his guilt.
I think what is more important from this chain of events is ensuring anybody, regardless of guilt, is afforded a fair and unbiased trial, and is due decent representation. The scary thing is more the effort gone to to achieve a guilty verdict and the media circus which helped shape the public's opinion. The trial was over as soon as Kratz told his absolute fabrication of the events, suitable only for viewers 15 and above.Stop stating your opinion as fact mate. You know as much as anyone on this thread.
Interesting development there @johnson
Oh, the whole thing is mental mate. Kratz saying that in the press conference prior to the trial was unbelievable. I'm not sure of his innocence but that's not how it works, it should always be to prove his guilt.I think what is more important from this chain of events is ensuring anybody, regardless of guilt, is afforded a fair and unbiased trial, and is due decent representation. The scary thing is more the effort gone to to achieve a guilty verdict and the media circus which helped shape the public's opinion. The trial was over as soon as Kratz told his absolute fabrication of the events, suitable only for viewers 15 and above.
Yeah I was agreeing. The series can be taken as a critique of the judicial process above all. I'm getting bored with people vehemently espousing Avery's innocence when, in reality, there's only one person who truly knows. I don't think he did it, but I'm not his cheerleader and wouldn't be shocked if it turned out that he did.Oh, the whole thing is mental mate. Kratz saying that in the press conference prior to the trial was unbelievable. I'm not sure of his innocence but that's not how it works, it should always be to prove his guilt.
It's just johnson being johnson that i was initially responding to.![]()
And, for that matter, how can a judge watch it and say he sees no evidence of manipulation?
Yeah I was agreeing. The series can be taken as a critique of the judicial process above all. I'm getting bored with people vehemently espousing Avery's innocence when, in reality, there's only one person who truly knows. I don't think he did it, but I'm not his cheerleader and wouldn't be shocked if it turned out that he did.
Interesting article in the New Yorker here about the possible issues with the way the doc was presented.