I've already discussed with you that I went to a talk-in with Mark Clattenberg where he talked about "games going against the script" and "relief" in big games when he was able to give a pen to "return to script".Yet when we happened to be the smaller club in the premier league their mindset was apparently the complete opppsite to favour the big clubs.
Funny that!
Surely you can see the contradiction?
Maybe just all refs in every league just hate Sunderland and we just fucked,when we the small club we get nowt!
When we the big club we still get nowt!
A pre-determined script is essentially a bias, which I hope you'd agree is essentially cheating. Whether that bias is for for certain teams, bigger teams, underdogs, home crowds, away crowds or like Probert on Saturday seemingly just to make himself the talking point at the of the game, it's clear that some referees don't judge every decision on merit which is not fair and not impartial (which referees should be)
You've suggested in the past that by the law of averages, decisions must even themselves out at the end of the season but you're essentially admitting that bias exists and excusing it. The only contradiction is from you.
When a single decision can cost points which in turn can potentially be the difference between a promotion spot, a championship or for some teams a relegation, and the enormous sums involved in today's game, it's time that technology was used to take away any potential for bias that certain individual referees have.