Mags suing Milan?


I could be wrong, because i'm not a regular gambler, but can't you bet on all aspects of the game ? You don't need to fix the result.
Chances of an own goal.
No. of bookings.
Chances of a penalty.
Easy to influence those.
As I stated in the next line you can bet on things like getting booked . And you are correct in what you state but those markets would throw up suspicious betting patterns . But to actually fix a result is in my opinion very difficult. Like if Tonoli got himself sent off or scored an own goal Newcastle could still win .
 
I can't understand Tonoli ....I understand betting addiction ,but you can literally bet on every sport under the sun without him getting in bother . But he chooses football ...utter stupidity

It's not like you can actually fix football matches as it's a team sport . The only thing he could possibly fix would be things like Tonoli to get booked . But the amount of money to make that worth while would draw suspicion.

Plain daft by him which ever way you look at it

Milan will surely just deny all knowledge.
So you don't understand gambling addiction, it's not the placing of the bet that they are addicted to. Different people get that endorphin kick in different ways, it's also not necessarily about the feeling you get when you win either. I'd say Tonali's alleged addiction was to high stake / high risk bets.

He has admitted to a) being addicted b) betting on football in Milan. If he hasn't placed a bet on football since his arrival in the UK then that puts a) into question so you'd have expected him to have bet on football over here and based on his other admissions you'd expect that to include games involving Newcastle. First place to look would be that highly suspicious yellow card against Aston Villa.
 
Should have done their due diligence then shouldn't they? Nothing like mags whinging about anything and everything, eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4

Back
Top