Phantom of mobs
Striker
They both seem to hate their own fansI actually think he is Martin Bain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They both seem to hate their own fansI actually think he is Martin Bain.
Bandwagon jumpers the lot of them,the Keegan era returns
The mags need to know the abuse they gave Sunderland fans for years now that's hypocrisy,and check attendance pre 1993Look at Sunderland attendances in the Championship against Newcastle attendances in the Championship. Who's the bandwagon jumpers? Nothing like a bit of hypocrisy. People on here need to just remember the abuse they sent to the neighbours last season and accept it that it's now your turn to wear your pants around your ankles.
The mags need to know the abuse they gave Sunderland fans for years now that's hypocrisy,and check attendance pre 1993
It will show the crowds were similar for both clubs - maybe you lot shaded itWhy? Will it show Sunderland attendances higher than Newcastle every season before 1993? Will we be under 20k every year?
Why? Will it show Sunderland attendances higher than Newcastle every season before 1993? Will we be under 20k every year?
What daffy saidIt will show the crowds were similar for both clubs - maybe you lot shaded it
Doesn't alter the fact we have the highest attendance - 75 ooo
Or that we won the last major trophy or that we've took the piss in recent derbys
It will show the crowds were similar for both clubs - maybe you lot shaded it
Doesn't alter the fact we have the highest attendance - 75 ooo
Or that we won the last major trophy or that we've took the piss in recent derbys
I think we've more than 'shaded it'.
This wouldn't be the classic 'found to be talking shite so deflect onto something else' tactic, would it?
Cheers becsI like some of them mind
NahI think we've more than 'shaded it'.
This wouldn't be the classic 'found to be talking shite so deflect onto something else' tactic, would it?
You still cling onto the 5-1 man ya titBetween 2002-2006 we beat them five times in a row. Dont see our lot harping on about it.
No they spout attendance and 5-1 which is like a broken recordBetween 2002-2006 we beat them five times in a row. Dont see our lot harping on about it.
Nah
Decent support
Won fuck all since rationing was the norm
You still cling onto the 5-1 man ya tit
Nah
Decent support
Won fuck all since rationing was the norm
You still cling onto the 5-1 man ya tit
Not you individuallyYou are right, I mention it all the time. Care to post a single thread where i have or are you just talking bollocks?
No they spout attendance and 5-1 which is like a broken record
Why?Fuck sake mods please delete this thread man
Why would you be on here?
There's a thread about attendances for every one of your home games on here, man. Sometimes there's more than one.
I've never seen that on any of our boards.
Shaded it in terms of average crowdsJust checked and from 1950 - 1992 we had the better attendance 29 to 13 times.
'Shaded it' Probably from the same train of thought that was adamant Sunderland have had a bigger overhaul of players this season than we had last season.
I'd go on but a quick glance without working it out suggests that margin would only increase. Not bad for a team that wasn't even formed around that time.
Shaded it in terms of average crowds
However we all know it's all you's bang on about as you've won fuck all for decades
You actually frequent mag boards ?
There's a thread about attendances for every one of your home games on here, man. Sometimes there's more than one.
I've never seen that on any of our boards.