• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

LVCC - Durham v Notts

Status
Not open for further replies.
What we've found out today:

Colly has still got it.
The pitch has possibly flattened out
If Notts win from here they thoroughly deserve it.
Rushy has a problem when he's in the forties :lol:
 

Yorkshire torturing Lancs. Lyth is just 10 short of his career best score of 248 not out and they have come out and hit 9 off the first over after lunch. Partnership is 254 so far.
 
First one down "caught LBW" according to the man on the tannoy! Not a happy Mullaney trudging back to the pavilion. 22 - 1. 353 behind ........ :lol:
 
Can someone explain why it says on cricinfo that rushy got lumb lbw for 17 when the score was 37.

I was downstairs and the sidebar on cricinfo is different to the main column.
 
mackembhoy said:
Can someone explain why it says on cricinfo that rushy got lumb lbw for 17 when the score was 37.

I was downstairs and the sidebar on cricinfo is different to the main column.

Here's a screenshot

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...

I saw that too mate. Imagine my disappointment when 37-2 changed back to 37-1 and progressed......
 
mackembhoy said:
Can someone explain why it says on cricinfo that rushy got lumb lbw for 17 when the score was 37.

I was downstairs and the sidebar on cricinfo is different to the main column.

Here's a screenshot

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Score was 22 when the first wicket fell which was Mullaney and I think Lumb was on 17, who has moved on to 25. Just a cock up by Cricinfo.
 
Dougal said:
Score was 22 when the first wicket fell which was Mullaney and I think Lumb was on 17, who has moved on to 25. Just a cock up by Cricinfo.
Click to expand...
Still down as 37-2 on the sidebar after 12.2 overs. Very bizarre,as taylor still hasn't came up on the sidebar.

Anyway we got taylor which is a big wicket, hopefully we can get one of these quickly.
 
mackembhoy said:
Can someone explain why it says on cricinfo that rushy got lumb lbw for 17 when the score was 37.

I was downstairs and the sidebar on cricinfo is different to the main column.
Click to expand...
Mind there was a massive shout for LBW just before Taylor's wicket. Everyone behind the stumps went up for it big time followed by a belated appeal from Rushy which sort of gave it away :lol:. The media may have thought it was out ....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top