PS
Striker
I've lost track. So why was he sacked?Apart from him having a full season in charge of a team he kept up the previous season, and got them on the verge of the play offs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've lost track. So why was he sacked?Apart from him having a full season in charge of a team he kept up the previous season, and got them on the verge of the play offs.
I've seen both as well, fair few saying it is boring football playing it around the back with no attack, especially at home. We're used to playing it around the back instead of moving it forward thoughSo does he play defensive boring football or open attacking football? Cos I'm seeing both opinions coming out of Hull fans & pundits on twitter
Well confused.
Style of play. The owner went very public about itI've lost track. So why was he sacked?
WitchcraftLooks rather nice to me.
What was that strange thing they did at the end where the ball went in the net? Surely they needed 785 more touches side to side
Even Mowbray the messiah was doing it.I've seen both as well, fair few saying it is boring football playing it around the back with no attack, especially at home. We're used to playing it around the back instead of moving it forward though![]()
Followed by half the SMB going off it even though they say they don’t want him .5pm tomorrow:
'Rosenior rejects Sunderland'
It feels like we’ve slipped back into mick beale territory where the first cheap available candidate who’s willing to work with the existing setup gets the gig. So frustrating when the whole point of letting last season die a slow painful death was to buy time to identify and recruit the best man for the job.Because they’ve had weeks and weeks to sort it out. If they wanted rosenior when he was at hull they didn’t move for him. When he was sacked he didn’t jump to the top of the list or they’d have appointed him already.
It’s been a month since he was sacked and nearly two weeks since hull hired their replacement. Its clear he was well down the pecking order.
They’ve had months and months to interview candidates. Unless they’re interviewing thousands or interviewing one a months there’s no way it should be taking anywhere near this long
No striker and playing around the back - sounds like Speakmans wet dreamI've seen both as well, fair few saying it is boring football playing it around the back with no attack, especially at home. We're used to playing it around the back instead of moving it forward though![]()
You tube highlights real appears to be just one solitary goal so possibly on the boring side. Will also have to be assimilated into the safc model and find a way to win with both Speakman and Dodds telling him what to do.Hearing that his style of play is very boring most of the time and subs cost.
I hope he’s learned from that
But by accident they may end up with a better option so![]()
Didn't realise that actually, I'm still not sold mind. I think after all the cashing around and time spent searching it's a little uninspiring. But maybe I'm just not being realistic and also uninformed.Apart from him having a full season in charge of a team he kept up the previous season, and got them on the verge of the play offs.
The best football I've seen Sunderland play for decades was under the stewardship of "another sacked championship reject".Not impressed by this at all
Waiting until halfway through June to get yet another sacked championship reject. Is this really the best Speakman can do?
Agreed need a better operator on the first teamThats the problem though, this could be a happy accident, but it screams terrible planning all the same. Given we're unable to beat others finances, we have to beat them through being brighter, rather than luckier. This isn't that, its an absolute cluster.
Never had an xG of more than 1.5? Is that really right?Ainsworth has a similar video from beginning of last season at QPR.
You must be logged on to see external links