Peaknutt
Striker
Sky Sports are reporting £9M including add-0ns, could end up £12-13M
![]()
Including add-ons means the adds are factored into the £9m fee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sky Sports are reporting £9M including add-0ns, could end up £12-13M
![]()
Aye a team full of young talent and pace, and a touch of class in cabaye, the daft c.unts
I don't know how I feel about this transfer, I do know that 9m including all add ons isn't 9m.
Wickhams probablys licking his lips at the service he will get, and we have knackers on her laughing at Palace rather than aim at their own shambles of a club.
Sunderland supporters are happy to be shite, minority that want us to compete get labelled as moaners.
£9m for that heap of shite![]()
I don't know how I feel about this transfer, I do know that 9m including all add ons isn't 9m.
So what's he going to do with this service? His anticipation isn't the best, he's hardly a fox in the box, his heading is nothing shout about, he's hopeless with his back to goal. Apart from that though, he'll score dozens.
I think you got that backwards.It is. The word "including" is the give away.
Change including to plus and you might have a point.
I think you got that backwards.
I think you got that backwards.
That's it. I'd imagine they do have a sell on clause. I'm more talking about people saying it's a lot of money, it's likely 5-6m fixed up to 9m, if these reports are anything resembling accurate.Doesn't really matter if the club are doing it to get him off the wage bill.
If the club had any nous theyd have a sell on clause of at least 20% in case he does become a hit
I think you got that backwards.
9m including addons means at most it will only ever be 9m.
9m plus addons means the fee could rise.
If it was 9m plus add-ons, it would be more than 9m. I think that's fairly obvious. 9m including add ons means up to 9m if all add on criteria are met.No I think you're backwards.
If it was 9m plus add-ons, it would be more than 9m. I think that's fairly obvious. 9m including add ons means up to 9m if all add on criteria are met.
The deal is 9m, including add ons means part of that 9m includes add ons.
The deal is 9m plus add ons means 9m and additional money from add ons.
How embarrassing having a mag explain it to him![]()
Which is what I said![]()
In a struggling side aye.
Might become a different player if he hits the ground running with a bit of confidence in a young pacey side. Take a look at Defoes Sunderland goals so far, hes had very few laid on, screamer v Mags, Dribble v Swansea. We are hardly a team where strikers can thrive for the football oracles to judge him so harshly.
He got 5 goals in one of the worst attacking sides in the league, are you trying to imply he isn't capable of doubling that in much more attacking and talented side than us?
Aye, I was typing while you edited.Which is what I said![]()
I don't know what kind of centre forward he is, and I don't think he dies either, let alone all the managers who've had him.
He should be an ideal target man in the shearer mould, he's got the build but he's got no fight and no ball control.
Can he play on the shoulder as poacher? No for me, his movement is poor as is his anticipation. He's got decent pace, but tends to run into blind alleys.
I just don't know with him. What I do know is that we've got good money for him.
Yes but you've only ever seen him in our system. Hes not going to be asked to mark the oppositions full back at Palace. He will be asked to stay up top and link play with Zaha and Bolasie who have pace and trickery which will create more space for him.
Anyone could look shit in our team, we are slow static, play deep and play scared to lose football. Those writing him off and being extremely premature, he could easily go and have a Charlie Austin eque season next year. Im happy for him to go if we have done this to strengthen our midfield as sometimes it doesn't work out for certain players at certain clubs but Im definelty not labelling the lad as "Shite" or "Average" as hes not. People are praising Graham, well why haven't Palace bid 10m for Graham if hes so good??? SAFC fans happy to accept mediocrity once again.